THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS
19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and
fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar
named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich
man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels
carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In
Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with
Lazarus by his side. 24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me
and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue,
because I am in agony in this fire.’
25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your
lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but
now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between
us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go
from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’
27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus
to my family,28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will
not also come to this place of torment.’
29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the
Prophets; let them listen to them.’
30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone
from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’
31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses
and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the
dead.’”
New International Version (NIV)
jerusalem-bible-rich-man.jpg
ST JOHN CHRYSOSTOM’S SECOND DISCOURSE ON LUKE 16:19-31
THE PARABLE OF THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS
DISCOURSE II.
CONCERNING LAZARUS —- AND THAT THE SOULS OF THOSE THAT
DIE A VIOLENT DEATH DO NOT BECOME WANDERING SPIRITS—-CONCERNING ALSO FUTURE
JUDGMENT, AND CHARITY.
1. I was pleased yesterday to see your right feeling
when I entered upon the subject of Lazarus, inasmuch as you approved of the
patience of the poor man, and shrank from the cruelty and inhumanity of the rich
man. These are no small tokens of a noble mind. For if, though not possessing
virtue, we yet praise it, then we may be at all events more able to attain it.
In like manner if, though we do not flee from sin, we still blame sin, then we
may at all events be able to escape from it. Since, therefore, you received
that address with great favour, let me deliver to you those things which still
remain.
You then saw Lazarus in the gateway of the rich man;
to-day behold him in Abraham’s bosom. You saw him then licked by dogs; see him
now guarded and tended by angels. You saw him then in poverty; behold him now
in affluence. You saw him wanting food; behold him enjoying the greatest
plenty. You saw him engaged in the contest; behold him crowned as victor. You saw
his labour; behold his reward; behold it, whether you be rich or poor,—-if
rich, that you may not think highly of wealth apart from virtue,—-if poor, that
|39 you may not think poverty, in itself, an evil. To both classes this man may
afford instruction. If he, living in poverty, did not resent his lot, what
excuse will they have who do so in wealth? If, living in want and amid so many
ills, he could give thanks, what defence can they make who, while they possess
abundance, have no desire to attain to the virtue of thankfulness? Again; those
who are poor, and who on that account are vexed and discontented, what excuse
can they have, when this man, who lived in continual hunger and poverty,
desertion and weakness, and who passed his days hard by the dwelling of a rich
man; who was scorned by all, while there was no one else who had suffered the
like, to whom he might look, still showed such patience and resignation? Prom
him we may learn not to think the rich happy nor the poor miserable. Or rather,
to speak the truth, he is not rich who is surrounded by many possessions, but
he who does not need many possessions; and he is not poor who possesses
nothing, but he who requires many things. We ought to consider this to be the
distinction between poverty and wealth. When, therefore, you see any one
longing for many things, esteem him of all men the poorest, even though he
possess all manner of wealth; again, when you see one who does not wish for
many things, judge him to be of all men most affluent, even if he possess
nothing. For by the condition of our mind, not by the quantity of our material
wealth, should it be our custom to distinguish between poverty and affluence.
As also in the case of a man who is always thirsty, we do not say that he is in
health, even should he enjoy abundance,—-even should |40 he lie beside rivers
and streams; for what is the use of this abundance of water while his thirst is
unquenched?
Thus also we conclude in the case of the rich; we can never think
those wealthy who are perpetually desiring and thirsting for other people’s
possessions, not even if they enjoy a certain kind of abundance. For he who
cannot restrain his desires, even if he should be surrounded by every kind of
possessions, how can he ever be rich? Those, indeed, who are satisfied with
their own property, enjoying what they have, and not casting a covetous eye on
the substance of others, even if they be, as to means, of all men the most
limited, ought to be regarded as the most affluent. For he who does not desire
other people’s possessions, but is willing to be satisfied with his own, is the
wealthiest of all.
However, with your permission, let us return to the
proposed subject. “It came to pass,” it is said, “that Lazarus died; and he was
carried up by angels,” (Luke xvi. 22.) Here, before I proceed, I desire to
remove a wrong impression from your minds. For it is a fact that many of the
less instructed think that the souls of those who die a violent death become
wandering spirits, (demons.)
But this is not so. I repeat it is not so.1 For not
the souls of those who die a violent death become demons, but rather the souls
of those who live in sin; not that their nature is changed, but that in their
desires they imitate the evil nature of demons. Showing this very thing to the
Jews, Christ said, “Ye are the children of the devil,” (John vii. 44.) He said
that they were the children of the devil, not because they were |41 changed
into a nature like his, but because they performed actions like his. Wherefore
also He adds:—- “For the lusts of your father ye will do.” Also John says: “O
generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Do
therefore works meet for repentance. And think not to say, We have Abraham for
our father” (Matt. iii. 7-9.) The Scripture, therefore, is accustomed to base
the laws of relationship, not on natural origin, but on good or evil
disposition; and those to whom any one shows similarity of manners and actions,
the Scripture declares him to be their son or their brother.
2. But for what object did the evil one introduce this
wicked saying? It is because he would strive to undermine the glory of the
martyrs. For since these also died a violent death, he did this with the
intention of spreading a low estimation of them. This, however, he is unable to
effect; they remain in possession of their former glory. But another and more
grievous thing he has brought to pass; he has, by these means, persuaded the
wizards who do his work to murder many innocent children, expecting them to
become wandering spirits, and afterward to be their servants. But these notions
are false: I repeat they are false. What then if the demons 2 say, “I am the
spirit of such and such a monk”? Neither because of this do I credit the
notion, since evil spirits say so to deceive those who listen to them. |42
For this reason St Paul stopped their mouth, even when
speaking the truth, in order that they might not, on this pretext, at another
time mingle falsehood with the truth, and still be deemed worthy of credit. For
when they said, “These men are the servants of the most high God, which show
unto us the way of salvation,” (Acts xvi. 17;) being grieved in spirit, he
rebuked the sorceress, and commanded the spirits to go out. What evil was there
in saying, “These men are the servants of the most high God”? Be that as it
may, since many of the more weak-minded cannot always know how to decide aright
concerning things spoken by demons, he at once put a stop to any credence in
them. “If,” he implied, “thou art one of those in dishonour, thou hast no
liberty of speaking: be silent, and open not thy mouth; it is not thy office to
preach; this is the privilege of the apostles. Why dost thou arrogate to
thyself that which is not thine? Be silent! thou art fallen from honour.” The
same thing also Christ did, when the evil spirits said to Him, “We know Thee
who Thou art,” (Mark i. 24; Luke iv. 24.) He rebuked them with great severity,
teaching us never to listen to spirits, not even when they say what is true.
Having learnt this, therefore, let us not trust at all in an evil spirit, even
though he speak the truth; let us avoid him and turn away. Sound doctrine and
saving truth are to be learned with accuracy, not from evil spirits, but from
the Holy Scripture.
To show that it is not true that the soul, when it
departs from the body, comes under the dominion of evil spirits, hear what St
Paul says: “He that is dead is freed |43 from sin,” (Rom. vi. 7,) that is, he
no longer sins. For if while the soul dwells in the body, the devil can use no
violence against it, it is clear that he cannot when the soul has departed. How
is it then, say they, that men sin, if they do not suffer any violence? They
sin voluntarily and intentionally, surrendering themselves without compulsion or
coercion. And this all those prove who have overcome the evil one’s devices.
Thus [Satan] was unable to persuade Job to utter any blasphemous word, though
he tried a thousand plans. Hence it is manifest that it is in our power either
to be influenced or not to be influenced by his counsels; and that we are under
no necessity nor tyranny from him. And not only from that which has just been
said, but from the parable, it is quite certain that souls when they leave the
body do not still linger here, but are forthwith led away. And hear how it is
shown: “It came to pass,” it is said, “that he died, and was carried away by
the angels.” Not the souls of the just only, but also those of sinners are led
away. This also is clear from the case of another rich man. For when his land
brought forth abundantly, he said within himself, “What shall I do? I will pull
down my barns and build greater,” (Luke xii. 18.) Than this state of mind
nothing could be more wretched. He did in truth pull down his barns; for secure
storehouses are not built with walls of stone; they are “the mouths of the
poor.” 3 But this man neglecting these, was busy about stone walls. What,
however, did God say to him? “Thou fool, this night shall they require thy soul
of thee.” Mark also: in one passage it is said that the soul is |44 carried
away by angels; in the other, that “they require it;” and in the latter case
they lead it away as a prisoner; in the former, they guard and conduct it as a
crowned victor. And like as in the arena a combatant, having received many
wounds, is drenched with blood; his head being then encircled with a crown,
those who stand ready by the spot take him up, and with great applause and
praise they bear him home amid shouting and admiration. In this way the angels
on that occasion led Lazarus also away. But in the other instance dreadful
powers,4 probably sent for that purpose, required the soul. For it is not of
its own accord that the soul departs this life; indeed, it is not able.
For if
when we travel from one city to another we need guides, much more does the soul
stand in want of those who can conduct it, when it is separated from the flesh,
and is entering upon the future state of existence. For this reason it often
rises up and again sinks down into the depth below; it fears and shivers as it
is about to put off the flesh. The consciousness of sin ever pierces us, and
chiefly at that hour when we are about to be led hence to the account there to
be rendered, and to the awful tribunal. Then, if a man has robbed, if he has
been covetous, if he has been haughty, if he has unjustly been any one’s enemy,
if he has committed any other sin whatsoever, all the load of guilt is brought
fresh to light, and being placed before the eye causes mental compunction. And
as those who live in prison are always in sorrow and pain, and especially on
that day when they are to be led forth, and brought to the place where they are
to be tried, and |45 placed at the bar, and hear the voice of the judge
within;5 as they then are full of fear, and seem no better than dead men, so
the soul, though it is much pained at the very moment of the sinful act, is
much more afflicted when about to be hurried away.
3. Ye are silent as ye listen to these things. Much
rather would I have silence than applause. Applause and praises tend to my own
glory; but silence tends to make you wiser. I know that what has been said
causes pain, but it brings also great and inexpressible advantage. That rich
man, if he had had some one to admonish him of these things, and had not had
those flatterers counselling him always with a view to favour, and encouraging
him in luxury, would not have come to the place of punishment; 6 he would not
have endured those insupportable tortures, he would not afterwards have
repented so inconsolably. But since all his associates spoke with a view to
favour, they betrayed him to the fire. Oh that we could at all times and
constantly act wisely with respect to these things, and speak thus concerning
future punishment! “In all thy words,” it is said, “remember thy latter end,
and thou wilt never sin,” (Ecclus. vii. 36.) And again, “Prepare thy work for
going forth, and make ready for thy journey,” (Prov. xxiv. 27, LXX.) If thou
hast defrauded any one of anything, restore it, and say with Zacchaeus “I
restore him fourfold,” (Luke xix. 8.) If thou hast slandered any, if thou hast
been any one’s enemy, be reconciled before thou comest before the Judge. Settle
every affair here, that thou mayest see that tribunal with untroubled mind. As
long as we are here we |46 have good hope, but when we come there, we no longer
have it in our power to repent nor to cleanse ourselves from our sins.
Wherefore it is necessary to be always ready for our going thither. For what if
this evening it should seem good to the Lord to call us? What if He should do
so to-morrow? The future is left uncertain, that we may be constantly striving
and prepared for departure. Thus then Lazarus was at all times submissive and
patient, and therefore he was led away with such honour. The rich man also died
and was buried: his soul also was buried in the body as in a tomb, and bore
about its sepulchre, the flesh. Having fettered his soul by drinking and
gluttony as by a chain, he had thus made it inactive and dead.
Beloved, do not carelessly pass by this word “he was
buried;” but let us think of the tables inlaid with silver, the couches, the
carpets, the vestments, all the ornaments throughout the house, the unguents,
the perfumes, the abundance of wine, the variety of meats, the confections, the
cooks, the flatterers, the attendants, the household slaves, and all the rest
of the display, all burnt up and come to nought. All is ashes, all cinders and
dust, lamentations and mourning; no one any longer able to help him, or to
bring back the departing soul. Then was made manifest the real power of gold,
and of all the rest of his wealth. From all that crowd of attendants, he
departed naked and alone, not being able out of all that abundance to carry
anything away; but he went away destitute and deserted. No one of all his
servants, no one of his supporters was at hand to rescue him from punishment,
but led away from all these, he is alone taken |47 to bear those insupportable
penalties. Truly “all flesh is as grass, and all the glory thereof as the
flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower fadeth; but the word of
the Lord abideth for ever,” (Isa. xl. 6, 7.)
Death came and withered all those
things, and seizing the man himself as a captive, led him away downcast, filled
with shame, speechless, trembling, afraid; him who had, as in a dream, enjoyed
all that luxury. And after this, the rich man became a suppliant of the poor
man, and required a supply from the table of him who once was famishing, and
who lay at his gate, licked by dogs. Affairs were now reversed. All men now
learned which was the rich man and which the poor, and that Lazarus was one of
the most wealthy of men, and the rich man one of the most destitute. Just as in
a play, certain men enter, wearing masks of kings and generals, and physicians
and orators, and sophists and soldiers, being themselves in reality none of
these; thus also, with respect to the present life, both poverty and wealth are
only masks. As, therefore, when sitting in the theatre, you see one of the players
on the stage, having on the mask of a king, you do not think him happy, nor
think him really a king; neither would you wish to become like him; but since
you know that he is some common man or other—-a rope-maker, perhaps, or a
worker in brass, or some one else of that sort, you do not think him happy
because of his mask and his dress, nor do you judge of his condition in life by
these things, but you rather look down upon him because of his insignificance
in other respects. Thus in truth also, here in this present life, it is as if
we were sitting in a theatre, and looking at the players on the |48 stage. Do
not, when you see many abounding in wealth, think that they are in reality
wealthy, but dressed up in the semblance of wealth.
And as one man, representing
on the stage a king or a general, often may prove to be a household servant, or
one of those who sell figs or grapes in the market; thus the rich, man may
often chance to be the poorest of all. For if you remove his mask and examine
his conscience, and enter into his inner mind, you will find there great
poverty as to virtue, and ascertain that he is the meanest of men. As also, in
the theatre, as evening closes in, and the spectators depart, those who come
forth divested of their theatrical ornaments, who seemed to all to be kings and
generals, now are seen to be whatever they are in reality; even so with respect
to this life, when death comes, and the theatre is deserted, when all, having
put off their masks of wealth or of poverty, depart hence, being judged only by
their works, they appear, some really rich, some poor; some in honour, some in
dishonour. Thus it often happens, that one of those who are here the most
wealthy, is there most poor, as it was also in the case of this rich man. For
when evening, that is, death, came, and he went out from the theatre of the
present life, and put off his mask, he was seen there to be poorest of all,
even so poor as not to possess a drop of water, but obliged to beg for this,
and not gain the object of his petition. What could be more abject than poverty
like this? And hear how having lifted up his eyes, he said to Abraham, “Father,
have mercy on me and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in
water and cool my tongue,” (Luke xvi. 24.) Do you see how great his tribulation
is? Him |49 whom he passed by when he was close at hand, he now calls to when
far off; him upon whom he often, in going out and coming in, did not bestow a
glance, he now, when far off, regards steadfastly.
But why does he now look at him? Very often, perhaps,
the rich man had said, “What need have I of piety and goodness? All things flow
to me as from a perennial fountain. I enjoy great honour, great prosperity. I
suffer no unwished-for casualty. Why should I strive after goodness? This poor
man, though he lives in piety and goodness, suffers a thousand ills.” Many in
these days often say such things. In order, therefore, that these false notions
might be completely rooted out, it is shown to the rich man, that for
wickedness there is in store punishment, and for righteous toil, a crown and
honour.
And not only on this account did the rich man then see the poor man,
but also that the rich man should endure the same that the poor man had
endured, and in a higher degree. As therefore, in the case of the poor man, his
being laid at the gate of the rich man, and thus seeing the prosperity of
another, had made his affliction much heavier, thus also, in the case of the
rich man, it made his pain greater, that he, now lying in the place of
punishment,7 also sees the bliss of Lazarus; so that, not only by the very
nature of torture, but by the contrast with the other’s honour, he should bear
more insufferable punishment. And as God, when He drove Adam forth from
Paradise, caused him to dwell opposite to Paradise, that the constant sight,
ever renewing his grief, might produce in him a sense of his falling away from
good; |50 thus also did He place this man within sight of Lazarus, that he
might see of what he had deprived himself. “I sent to thee,” He might say,
“this poor man Lazarus to thy gate, that he might be to thee a teacher of
virtue, and an oportunity for the exercise of benevolence. Thou didst overlook
the gain; thou wert not willing to use aright this means of salvation. From henceforth
find it to be a cause of increased pain and punishment.”
We learn from this that all those whom we have
de-spitefully treated or wronged will then meet us face to face. Still this man
was not in any way wronged by the rich man: for the rich man did not seize any
of his property; yet he bestowed not upon him any of his own. And since he did
not bestow anything on him, he had the neglected poor man for his accuser. What
mercy can he expect who has robbed other men’s goods, when he is surrounded by all
those whom he has injured! No need is there of witnesses, none of accusers,
none of evidences or proofs; but the very deeds themselves, whatsoever we have
committed, will then be placed before our own eyes.
Behold, then, it is said, the man and his works. This
also is robbery—-not to impart our good things to others. Very likely it may
seem to you a strange saying; but wonder not at it, for I will, from the Divine
Scriptures, bring testimony showing that not only robbery of other men’s goods,
but also the not imparting our own good things to others,—-that this also is
robbery, and covetous-ness, and fraud. What then is this testimony? God,
rebuking the Jews, speaks thus through the prophet: “The earth has brought
forth her fruit, and ye have not brought in the tithes; but the plunder of the
poor is in |51 your houses,” (Mal. iii. 10.) Since, it is said, ye have not
given the customary oblations, ye have robbed the poor. This is said in order
to show to the rich that they possess things which belong to the poor, even if
their property be gained by inheritance,—-in fact, from what source soever
their substance be derived. And, again, in another place, it is said, “Do not
deprive the poor of life,” (Ecclus. iv. 1.) Now, he who deprives, deprives some
other man of property. It is said to be deprivation when we retain things taken
from others. And in this way, therefore, we are taught that if we do not bestow
alms, we shall be treated in the same way as those who have been extortioners.
Our Lord’s things they are, from whencesoever we may obtain them. And if we
distribute to the needy we shall obtain for ourselves great abundance.
And for
this it is that God has permitted you to possess much,—-not that you should
spend it in fornication, in drunkenness, in gluttony, in rich clothing, or any
other mode of luxury, but that you should distribute it to the needy. And just
as if a receiver of taxes, having in charge the king’s property, should not
distribute it to those for whom it is ordered, but should spend it for his own
enjoyment, he would pay the penalty and come to ruin; thus also the rich man
is, as it were, a receiver of goods which are destined to be dispensed to the
poor—-to those of his fellow-servants who are in want. If he then should spend
upon himself more than he really needs, he will pay hereafter a heavy penalty.
For the things he has are not his own, but are the things of his
fellow-servants.
5. Let us then be as sparing of our possessions as we
|52 should be of those of other people, that they may become really our own. In
what manner, then, can we be as sparing of them as of those of other people? By
not expending them on superfluous wants, nor for our own needs only, but by
imparting them also to the poor. Even if you are a rich man, if you spend more
than you need, you will render an account of the property which has been
entrusted to you. This same thing happens in great households. Many in this way
entrust their entire property into the hands of dependants; yet those who are
thus trusted take care of the things delivered to them, and do not squander the
deposit, but distribute to whomsoever and whensoever the master orders. The
same thing do you. If you have received more than others, you have received it,
not that you only should spend it, but that you should be a good steward of it
for the advantage of others.
It is worth while to inquire here, why it was that the
rich man beheld Lazarus, not in company with any other of the just, but in the
bosom of Abraham? Abraham was hospitable, and that there might be this rebuke
of his own inhospitality, therefore it was that the rich man saw Lazarus there.
Abraham used to lie in wait for those who passed by, and constrain them to
enter his abode; but this rich man neglected even one that lay within his very
porch; and while he had such a treasure, such an opportunity of salvation,
overlooked it each day, and did not show kindness to the poor man, even with
respect to the necessaries of life. But the patriarch was not like this. He was
the very opposite. Sitting at the |53 tent-door he captured,8 as it were, all
those that passed by, and as a fisher casting his net into the sea, draws up
fishes, and draws up also, it may be, sometimes gold or pearls, so also he, a
fisher of men, once entertained even angels; and there was this wonderful
circumstance, that he did so without knowing it. The same thing also St Paul
with much admiration insists on, in these words: “Be not forgetful to entertain
strangers; for thereby some have entertained angels unawares,” (Heb. xiii. 2.)
And well does he say unawares, (e1laqon.) For if they had knowingly received
them with such good-will, they would have done no great or wonderful thing: all
the praise depends on the fact that not knowing who they were that passed by,
and supposing them to be simply wayfaring men, they with such alacrity invited
them to enter. If when you receive some noble and honourable man you display
such zeal as this, you do nothing wonderful; for the nobility of the guest
obliges even the inhospitable often to show all kindness. It is this that is
great and admirable,—-that when they are chance guests, wanderers, people of
limited means, we receive them with great good-will. Thus also Christ, speaking
of those who acted thus, said: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the
least of these, ye have done it unto Me,” (Matt. xxv. 45.) And again, “It is
not the will of your Father that one of these little ones should perish,”
(Matt. xviii. 14.) And again, “Whoso shall offend one of these little ones, it
were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he
were cast into the sea,” (Matt. xviii. 6.) And at |54 all times Christ said
much on behalf of the poor and lowly.
Since Abraham also was wise in this respect, he did
not inquire of travellers as to who they were, or from whence they came, as we
do in these days; but he simply received all who passed by. It becomes him that
is truly well-disposed not to require an account of a man’s past life, but
simply to relieve poverty and to satisfy want. The poor man has only one
plea—-his poverty, and his being in want. Demand from him nothing more; but if
he be the most wicked of all, and be in need of necessary food, you ought to
satisfy his hunger. Thus did Christ command us to do, when he said, “Be ye like
your Father which is in heaven, for He maketh
His sun to shine on the evil and
on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust,” (Matt. v. 45.)
The merciful man is as a harbour to those who are in need; and the harbour
receives all who are escaping shipwreck, and frees them from danger, whether
they be evil or good; whatsoever kind of men they be that are in peril, it
receives them into its shelter. You also, when you see a man suffering
shipwreck on land through poverty, do not sit in judgment on him, nor require
explanations, but relieve his distress. Why do you give yourself unnecessary
trouble? God frees you from all such anxiety and labour. How many things would
many men have said, and how many difficulties would they have caused, if God
had commanded us to inquire accurately into a man’s life, his antecedents, the
things which each man had previously done; and after this, to have pity on him!
But now are we free from |55 all this trouble. “Why, then, do we burden
ourselves with superfluous cares? To be a judge is one thing, to be merciful is
another.
Mercy is called by that name for this reason, that it gives even to
the unworthy. This again St Paul teaches, when he says, “Be not weary in doing
good, indeed to all, but especially unto them that are of the household of
faith,” (Gal. vi. 10.) If we are concerned and troubled about keeping the
unworthy away, it will not be likely that the worthy come within our reach; but
if we impart to the unworthy, also the worthy —-even those who are so worthy as
to counterbalance all the rest—-will assuredly come under our influence. In
this way it befell Abraham, of blessed memory, who, not troubling himself nor
being inquisitive about these wayfarers, was once privileged to entertain even
angels. Him let us zealously imitate, and also his descendant Job. For even he
imitated with all diligence the magnanimity of his progenitor, and therefore
spoke thus: “My door was open to every traveller,” (Job xxxi. 32, LXX.) It was
not open to one and. closed to another, but open to all alike.
6. Thus, I beseech you, let us also do, not making a
more minute inquiry than is necessary. For the need of the poor man is a
sufficient cause of itself; and whosoever with this qualification should at any
time come to us, let us not trouble ourselves further; for we do not minister
to the character, but to the man: we have pity on him, not on account of his
virtue, but on account of his calamity, in order that we also may gain that
great mercy from the Lord—-that we also, though unworthy, may gain |56 His
favour. For if we seek for worthiness in our fellow-servants, and make diligent
inquiry, the same also will God do to us; and if we demand explanations from
our fellow-servants, we ourselves shall fail to gain favour from above. “With
what judgment,” it is said,9 “ye judge, ye shall be judged,” (Matt. viii. 2.)
But let us again turn our discourse to the subject on
hand. Seeing this poor man, therefore, in the bosom of Abraham, the rich man
said, “Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus.” Why does he not
address his words to Lazarus? It seems to me that he was ashamed and daunted,
and that he thought that Lazarus would assuredly retain an angry remembrance of
the things done to him. He would say within himself, “If I, while I enjoyed
such abundance, and without any just complaint against him, neglected this man
when he lived in such misery, and did not bestow upon him even the crumbs, much
more will he who has been thus neglected, not yield to pity.” We do not say this
to disparage Lazarus; for he was not at all thus disposed—-far from it; but the
rich man, fearing such things as this, did not address him, but raised his
voice to Abraham, whom he might suppose to be ignorant of what had happened.
And now he strove to gain the service of that finger which he had often allowed
to be licked by dogs.
What then did Abraham say to him? “Son! thou in thy
lifetime receivedst thy good things,” (Luke xvi. 25.) Mark the wisdom—-mark the
tenderness of the saint! He |57 did not say, “Inhuman and cruel man! full of
all wickedness! Having inflicted such evils on this man, dost thou now speak of
benevolence, or pity, or compassion! Dost thou not blush! Art thou not
ashamed!” But what does he say? “Son,” he saith, “thou receivedst thy good
things.” For it is also written, “Thou shalt not add trouble to an afflicted
soul,” (Ecclus. iv. 3.) The trouble which he has brought upon himself is
sufficient. Besides this, and to the end that you may not suppose that he
hinders Lazarus from going to the rich man because of any feeling of revenge
for the past, Abraham addresses him as “son,” as if he would by this mode of
address apologise for himself. “Whatever is in my power,” he implies, “I grant
to thee; but to leave this place is not now in my power. Thou didst receive thy
good things.” Why also did he not say “thou hadst” (ἔλαβες), but “thou
receivedst” (ἀπέαβες)? Here I perceive a vast sea of thought opening out before
us.
Therefore, keeping in mind with all care the things
which have been already said, as well those now said as those yesterday, let us
safely store them in the mind. By means of that which has been said, make
yourselves better prepared to hear that which will be spoken on another
occasion, and, if possible, remember all that has been said; and if that be not
possible, I beg that, chiefest of all, you will remember constantly that not to
share our own riches with the poor is a robbery of the poor, and a depriving
them of their livelihood; and that that which we possess is not only our own,
but also theirs. If our minds are disposed in accordance with this truth, we
shall freely use |58 all our possessions; we shall feed Christ while hungering
here, and we shall lay up great treasures there; we shall, be enabled to attain
future blessedness, by the grace and favour of our Lord, with whom, to the
Father and the Holy Spirit, be glory, honour, might, now and ever, even to all
eternity. Amen.
https://www.holymonasteryofaxionestin.org.au/events/2017/11/5/fifth-sunday-of-luke-the-rich-man-and-lazarus
https://www.holymonasteryofaxionestin.org.au/events/2017/11/5/fifth-sunday-of-luke-the-rich-man-and-lazarus
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σας ευχαριστούμε.
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.