Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

Πέμπτη 1 Φεβρουαρίου 2018

WATCHFULNESS, PRAYER AND HOLY CONFESSION.A homily by Elder Ephraim of Filotheou and Arizona







WATCHFULNESS, PRAYER AND HOLY CONFESSION



A homily by Elder Ephraim of Filotheou and Arizona, translated from the Greek by Fr. Seraphim Bell, pastor of St. Silouan the Athonite Orthodox Church in Walla Walla, WA.


My beloved children,
Today we will say a few things about the great virtue of watchfulness.


As you know, watchfulness is a patristic teaching, it is the experience of the great neptic fathers of the Church and of the desert. The word nepsis comes from nepho, which means to be sleepless, to guard, to inspect, examine, watch over, keep under surveillance. All these things the fathers sum up in one continuous attention to the nous. Watchfulness is described as the axe which shatters the large trees, hitting their roots. And when the root is struck, it doesn’t spring up again. Thus also when the nous of the man, of the Christian, has heed for the soul, it keeps watch over the heart and the five senses of the soul, the bodily as well as the spiritual. When the nous is awake, when it is attentive, when it keeps watch over the speculations, the thoughts, when it controls the imagination, then the whole man, body and soul, is kept pure. And when the man is rendered pure through watchfulness and spiritual works, his prayers have boldness before God, they cross the sky, they go beyond the stars, they pass through the heavens and draw near to the Divine 

Throne of Grace, where the blessings of God are granted. And this being the case, the man at prayer is enriched by the grace of God.
The neptic fathers tell us that one of our thoughts may rise to heaven and another may descend to hell. By our thoughts we are improved or defiled. In other words, a thought which may inattentively attack us, may pollute us, may pleasure us, and is able to render us worthy of hell. A heavenly thought, a thought of self-denial, a brave thought a thought of prayer and the vision of God, makes us worthy to draw near the Divine throne and to taste of heavenly things. By the thoughts either we will become unclean or we will become better. The beginning of sins starts with the thoughts.


The thoughts come from the five senses, the spiritual as well as the physical. When we allow the sense of sight to be un¬controlled and it carelessly sees anything, this carelessness will become no end of dirty and sinful images. Since these images are placed in the imagination, afterwards they drip the poison
of sinful pleasure inside the heart of man. This pleasure is the poison, by which the heart is polluted and then becomes unclean and guilty before the unsleeping eye of God. Just like the sense of sight, so it is also of touch, and also of taste and hearing and of smell. And so the five senses create analogous sinful images, which render the man unclean before the face of God. Here rests the entire philosophy of the spirit.


All sermons are beneficial, exactly because when a tree which is diseased is pruned, it is cleansed, and thus the word of God helps in the reduction of a passion. However, the teaching of the Fathers concerning watchfulness radically effects the cleansing from the passions. When the mattock, when the axe strikes the root, the entire tree falls down, it withers and is finished. So also when watchfulness takes a place in the life of the Christian, a tree of passion falls, it withers and thus in time, the old man, the man of sin and of passion, the earthly Adam is freed and he becomes a new man. For this reason, the neptic work frees us radically from evil. Here then we must give heed to our life. If we want to cleanse ourselves, we should make sure to enrich our nous by the application of watchfulness.


A part of watchfulness is also noetic prayer. The vision of God is another part of watchfulness. Spiritual warfare is also another part. All these parts, when they are united in an effort of man, in time bring about holiness.


Abba Paphnoutios, a great desert father, was going along one day on his way and there he saw two men committing some sin. The thought of his passion said: “Look what great evil they are doing!” The eye saw them and immediately the thought flared up, trying thereby to attack the purity of the saint’s soul by judging the brother or also by his being tempted. Having watchfulness, however, he was being vigilant, immediately his mind was enlightened and he said to his thought, “They are sinning today, I will sin tomorrow. They will repent, but I know myself to be a hard man, unrepentant, egotistical, and thus, I won’t repent. I will be punished since I am worse than these two. And what do I have to do about these careless sinners, since I am a much greater sinner and more passionate?” And speaking in this manner and putting a lock on the provocation of sin, he was saved and didn’t judge the brothers who were sinning.



He didn’t go very far and an Angel of God appeared before him having a double-edged cutless dripping blood; in other words, a knife which had cut from both sides and he says to him:
“Paphnoutios, you see this knife? Do you see that it is drip-ping blood?”
“I see it Angel of God.”
“With this knife I kill by taking the heads of the ones who judge their neighbors. And since you didn’t judge, you didn’t condemn those who were in fact sinning—not imagining or guessing that they were sinners, but seeing them sin 
with your own eyes—but you condemned yourself more, for this reason your name has been written in the book of eternal life.”
Success. His name is written in eternal life, because he didn’t judge the sinners, he didn’t condemn the sin of his brother. He would have judged if he hadn’t had watchfulness, if he hadn’t been vigilant noetically in guarding his soul. Do you see what good attention he produced? And do you see what harm he would have suffered, if he had been inattentive to the thought and allowed it to work within him! But his thought said that they were in fact sinning, he saw them. In spite of these things, however, even though the thought was spoken to him, the correct thought triumphed and thereby he escaped the shipwreck of his soul.


All of the passions have their own images, their own fan-tasies and their own pleasures. Murder has one image and another pleasure, gluttony has another and so many other sinful passions have others. Ail of the pleasures are otherwise poisons which bring about the death of the soul. 

We must take as our view that, if we want to clean the “inside of the cup,” the interior of the soul, our heart, this center of man, we must strive to keep watchful. We should take care to become better, that is, we should be vigilant to always have our hand on the trigger. With the first appearance of the enemy, we should shoot. As soon as an evil thought comes to us, immediately knock it down. A dirty image comes, immediately spoil it. We shouldn’t allow it to become more vivid in colors and in appearance, because thereby we will come to immediate difficulty. When the evil is struck at the root, it is impossible to sprout and to increase. When this struggle comes about with diligence, we will cleanse our soul and thereby we will be found clean and with boldness before God.
A pagan priest asked some monks:
“Does your God appear to you? Do you see Him? Does he speak to you?”
The fathers said:
“No.”
The pagan says:
“If he doesn’t speak to you and doesn’t appear to you, this means that you don’t have pure thoughts. When I pray, my God answers me.”
Naturally, God didn’t answer the pagan, the demons answered him, but nevertheless the fathers took it as an occasion of benefit and said:
“Indeed, the impure thoughts prevent man from communicating with God.”
Watchfulness does nothing less than cleanse the nous and the heart from every impurity. For this reason, with a little ascetical toil, watchfulness brings about the greatest spiritual results. When we strive ascetically and aren’t mindful of our thoughts, we accomplish nothing.

The Sacred Chrysostomos wrote many chapters about prayer and about wakefulness. And in the midst of them he says something very beautiful:
Prayer, he says, is enlightenment of the soul, true consciousness of God, a mediator between God and man, a physician of the passions, an antidote against diseases, medicine against every illness, tranquility of the soul, a guide which carries us to heaven, which doesn’t revolve around the earth, which marches towards the apse of heaven. It passes over the buildings, it passes mentally through the air, it walks above the air, it passes over the whole of the stars, it opens the gates of heaven, it surpasses the angels, it transcends the Thrones and Principalities, it passes over the Cherubim and when it has passed through all of the foundation of nature, it comes near to the unapproachable Trinity. There it worships the Divinity. There it is made worthy to become an interlocutor in the Heavenly Kingdom.  Through this (theprayer), the soul, which is lifted up in the air to the heavens, embraces the Lord in an inexpressible manner, exactly as the baby embraces its mother and with tears cries loudly, desiring the enjoyment of divine milk. But it seeks the things which are necessary and receives a gift superior to all visible nature.


Prayer is our venerable representative. It gladdens the heart. It gives rest to the soul. It creates within us thefear of the punishment of hell, the desire for the Kingdom of Heaven. It teaches humility, it grants awareness of sin and in general it adorns man with every good thing, like a robe adorned with all the virtues which enfolds the soul. It brought a gift to Anna, Samuel, and it made known that Prophet of the Lord. This prayer also made Elias a zealot of the Lord. And it became a guide for the descent of the heavenly fire for the sacrifice. For while the priest of Baal was calling all day long to the idol, he, after he Lifted up his voice which came from his pure heart and cried out through his mouth and his soul, the fire came down from heaven as a sign of the righteousness of his prayer. Since he was standing like an eagle over the altar with his fierce nature, he offered everything as a sacrifice. But the great servant of God, the zealot Elias, did this, as all that happened then, teaching us by the spirit, that we also crying loudly from the depths of our soul to God, should move the ineffablefire of the Holy Spirit to come down to the altar of our heart and to offer ourselves fully as a sacrifice to God.

All of the great fathers of the Church, especially the fathers of the desert, succeeded in becoming worthy of great gifts exclusively and only with watchfulness and vision of God (,theoria). Keeping vigil all night and coming to the vision of the Light of God.


We have St. Gregory Palamas, the instructor of the desert, the instructor of neptic activity, the teacher of noetic prayer. This saint would remain enclosed in his cell for the entire week. He didn’t go outside at all. There on his knees and with hands upraised, he was vigilant about his nous and his heart and he received heavenly theology (literally “theology from above”—trans.) by the Holy Spirit. The theology which 
made known the Uncreated Light of the Divine Glory, of the Divine Nature.


The Uncreated Light is the glory of the Divine Nature. There was the goal and the conclusion of asceticism and of prayer. When the saints received this Light, they became all Light. And since the light floods the nous and the heart, how could they know less than the mysteries of the secrets which are known only to the angels? Through watchfulness the fathers attained to the pinnacle of the virtues and of the graces.
And we, if we are watchful, if we pray, even if we are in the world, and even if we don’t attain to similar states, no matter what, we will attain to a condition of purity. When we succeed by watchfulness in not judging our brother, this is no small achievement. We put into practice the commandment of our Christ, which is as follows: Do not judge, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged, and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you. (Mt 7:1-2).


It is the commandment of Christ. It is not the commandment of some saint. It is God’s. And therefore we have put into practice a Divine commandment. When we do not judge, we will not be judged. Judge, and we will be judged. Sin is widespread. Wherever we turn our eyes and our imagination, we recognize the errors of men. Therefore, if we are inattentive, without watchfulness, we will always be found in the error of violation of this evangelical commandment of not judging our neighbor.


There was a monk in some monastery. The tempter had conquered him in negligence. He didn’t do his canon, he didn’t got to church, he didn’t do his rule of prayer, and thus the fathers didn’t know him and regarded him as negligent. The hour of death came and the fathers drew near him to see something, which perhaps God would show, in order that they may be benefited. Drawing near to the dying negligent monk, the fathers saw that he was very joyful. They were perplexed and they said in their thoughts:


“Look, why is he peaceful? The negligence which he had in his life doesn’t worry him? What happened to the debts which have been gathered because of sloth? His conscience doesn’t rebel? It doesn’t make him worry? He doesn’t despair?”
He continued to be joyful. They compelled him to answer their question:
“Forgive us, brother, we see you doing so-so. We know and you know that you lived in negligence and sloth in monastic duties. Now you are heading to the judgment of Christ, and you should be somewhat sorry, worried, etc. But we see you otherwise, joyful, peaceful, with hope and we question; what supports this condition of yours?”
He answered them and said:
“You are right, my fathers, that’s how it is. I was negligent and didn’t do what you did, but one thing I guarded in my life: not to judge my brother. I read in the Holy Gospel,
where the Lord says that the one who does not judge, will not be judged. Thus I tried, at least, not to judge. And I hope in the mercy of God that I will not be judged. For this reason I am departing with faith that God will apply his word.”


The fathers looked into it among themselves and said that in fact the brother was very clever and masterfully gained his salvation.
If we are watchful, we will not criticize. For with the offense of judging, immediately watchfulness will set up a barrier and the thought of judgment will be prevented from continuing. Then will happen what took place with Abba Paphnoutios. And so we will escape from the sin of judging and of criticism of the tongue and our names will be written in eternal life. A man who keeps his tongue pure, both inner and outer, that is to say, the inner thought and the tongue, and does this in the knowledge of God, this is a guarantee that he is saved.
This spiritual attention becomes light and as light, illumines the path. 

And an illumined path of watchfulness is also a path to sacred confession. The attention illumines it, which urges the man to settle his account with God. And he is guided by the light of watchfulness to this great mystery and there he deposits the entire debt, all the uncleanness of sins. He enters into this bath and he comes out entirely clean. And I say that we must have much joy in our souls when we are accounted worthy to come into this bath. We must celebrate and thank the Lord who allowed this bath on earth, who allowed this authority of “binding and loosing.” Whatever things your spiritual father looses, God also looses. Whatever the representative of God forgives, the Lord also forgives.


And when the man has been judged here below, he is not judged above in the great and fearsome judgment. It is a great occasion if the man arrives as far as that. For this reason, all those who have been accounted worthy of this bath and continuously cleanse every soiling of the soul with this spiritual bath of the mystery of God, should have very great joy, because the door of Paradise will always be open. And even if death follows, there is no anxiety. He is prepared and not disturbed. When the man is prepared, he is not disturbed at the approach of death. He knows that it is not possible for the word of God, which gave this authority, to be wrong. We experience it as a mystery of the Church and we see it in action and in application. When the man makes sacred confession with ardent desire, with humility, and with awareness, he feels the happiness within his soul, the lightness and the elation. A vivid proof that his sins have been forgiven. And when sins are forgiven, then every anxious and uncertain fear about the next life is removed.


Our thanks to God must be unceasing. Our thanksgiving must never stop, because we are made worthy every time we want to receive this cleansing, and every time we feel a sin, immediately turn the mind to God. “I have sinned Lord, forgive me. ” With this “I have sinned Lord, forgive me, ” God 
answers: My child, you are forgiven; the power of the law is remitted. 

Proceed to the application of the law. And the application is beneath the petraheli (stole). There, all the sinfulness of man is ended. Forgiveness is so easy! It is very wrong for man, when this forgiveness is so easy and so free, because of his egoism not to want to receive it, not to want to open the doors of paradise and walk eternally in the glory of God!
Many men say: “Man should call upon God because of one sin? But this thing is wrong. Where is the love of God? Isn’t God a father?” Yes, he is a father, but when every good moment comes for him to forgive you, why do you turn your back? Why do you not receive His mercy? Why do you refuse His embrace and go far away? Why do you accept the embrace of the devil and not of God? Perhaps your god seeks money or possessions or favors and you don’t have all these things and for this reason you don’t come to let go of your debt? No.

God is very rich, as we see also in the parable of the prodigal son. He wanted to depart far away. He demanded that part of the possessions which belonged to him. And God gave him what he was owed as physical gifts. He didn’t deprive him of them. However, he squandered these gifts, the spiritual possessions, living prodigally. And when he arrived at the wretched end, he came to his senses, he came to himself.  For he was not himself when all the prodigality reigned.  And when he came to himself he said: How many serve my father and they enjoy the good things of His possessions, and I His child, par excellence His child, am in such misery that I graze pigs and am allotted husks! I will return; He is a Father, He will receive me. I will ask forgiveness and will say to him, do not receive me as Your child, neither restore me to the first adoption, but I will ask him to become one of His servants. And this will be a great thing. When he thought these things, already the Father came out from His house and waited for him with open arms. He accepted him with all his heart and all his soul. He embraced him, he kissed him, he wept from joy, because he was dead and he was restored to life, he was lost and was found. He made him His child again with all of the wealth. He forgave everything. He cleansed him of every  filth. He clothed him in the original garments. In the end, he gave him everything.


The Heavenly Father also does this when one who is a sinner returns to Him. He cleanses him, washes him, he gives the original garments of baptism, he gives him son ship and makes him worthy of His Kingdom. 

Everything  free. When the prodigal returned, he didn’t seek an account, neither did he rebuke him nor did he seek to blame him. He begins where he returned; this was sufficient for the Father. Only to say “sinner,” to leave his sins with humility, to understand his mistakes and from then on everything is loosed. But the sinful man doesn’t do this. He doesn’t return, he isn’t humbled. He holds on to his egoism. The important thing is to get to the  confessional! It’s just two steps. And from then on everything is finished. Yet the tears of egoism hold him. And when he comes to the hour of death and the reality of it, then he will repent and he will be remorseful, but he will be too late. In this, God respects the one who doesn’t want to humble his spirit a little.


As for Lucifer, this great battalion commander, who was in the first place of the angelic hosts, what was the cause of the fall? What was the cause of the collapse, of the transformation from angels to demons? Pride and egoism. The error came from these two passions. And as with the angels, so also with our forebears. The fall of our forebears came about from pride and egoism. Because, before God accomplished the verdict of guilt, he approached the man Adam and said to him: Adam, why did you do this! Adam didn’t seek forgiveness, he didn’t say: God forbid, I was wrong. If he had done this, he wouldn’t have been turned out from Paradise and neither would we have all this banishment and suffering today. By not saying God forbid all this mob of evil came about. And thus now man doesn’t say God forbid and remains in his evil. But just say it, O God stretch out the arms of forgiveness, and He takes him in.


And again I say that because we have been made worthy to know as Orthodox Christians this mystery of sacred confes-sion, we should have very great joy, because even if any time we fall down in some sin, into something evil, we can run immediately to correct it and to preserve the health of our souls. And when death comes, we will go to meet the Lord, cleansed, repentant, as prodigal sons returned, for our Heavenly Father accepts us and places us in the Paradise of eternal bliss which has no end, which has no conclusion to that bliss, which cannot be compared to anything earthly.

Even the holy Apostle Paul, who went up to the third heaven and saw the eternal good things, nevertheless was unable with his apostolic and graceful tongue to express with human words, the things of Paradise and the life above! So inexpressible is the happiness of the attainment through sacred confession.


Therefore with much yearning, with much love, with much awareness we should run to be cleansed, to be made ready and when death follows, to depart in peace. Amen.


Orthodox - Heritage,  vol 16, issus 01-02

You ARE WHAT YOU EAT... By Protopresbyter James Thornton.





My Brothers and Sisters in Christ, soon we Orthodox Christians begin the Great Fast (Monday, February 19th for the current year, Ed.). We will enter an extended period of approximately seven weeks of more intense prayer and fasting until we reach holy Pascha, the Feast of Feasts, the Feast of Christ’s Resurrection. This is a period of golden opportunity for each of us wherein we may look deeply within ourselves and determine what, from a spiritual point of view, is unwholesome or deficient. We may then, during this time, begin the work of excising from our lives that which is unhealthy and, at the same time, augmenting that which is truly sound and truly pleasing to God.


I run the risk here of sounding prosaic and platitudinous when I recall the popular saying, “You are what you eat.” Yet I shall take the risk: you are indeed what you eat. It is quite obvious that if we eat luxuriously, if our diet is exclusively confined to the most extravagant foods, exotically flavored and rich in fats, spices, and sugars, as is typical of the con-temporary American diet, our individual physiologies will sooner or later bear the marks of those habits, either in various aspects of outward appearance or in the functioning of our bodily systems, or in both.
Moreover, our individual characters, personalities, and temperaments will be marked, and, likewise, and most importantly, our souls. An obsession with the worldly impresses itself on the whole of our beings. By way of contrast, more prudent choices in our diets, as prescribed during the Fast by our wise Mother the Church, will do the opposite, and may make us physically healthier, and most assuredly will make us spiritually healthier.


Some religious writers of a modernist or fundamentalist bent enjoy drawing our attention to the alleged fact that in early Christianity—primitive Christianity, as it is sometimes called—there were no Holy Canons regarding fasting, no Great Lent, practically no fasting rules at all. Holy Canons and fasting periods are seen by these writers as latter-day and, by implication, needless accretions, even “monkish” accretions in the estimation of many of them.


St. Paul writes of a difference of opinion between those who believe that they may eat all things and those who eateth herbs [i.e., vegetables], as he puts it. (Rom 14:2). We see from this passage that even at this earliest stage, just a few decades after Christ’s Ascension, questions about fasting from certain foods were already present and were already the subject of discussion. So, fasting was not unknown in the Apostolic Church. In fact, Orthodox historians maintain that the Wednesday and Friday fasts are of Apostolic origin and it is likely that, while the Lenten fasts were not codified in their current form until after the Apostolic period, that  codification nonetheless reflected an already established, though not always uniform, tradition.


Consequently, what the modernist and fundamentalist writers say is true only to the very limited extent that, in St. Paul’s day, certain details about fasting had not yet appeared and would take time to unfold. As with medical science or, let us say, the science of physics, the “science” that is Orthodox theology required time to mature.


The comparison here between the natural sciences and theology is apt, yet it is imperfect in one respect. In the case of the natural sciences, new discoveries that radically alter the body of fundamental knowledge are always possible. The discovery of the connection between bacteria and disease by nineteenth-century medical science or the displacement of classical physics by quantum physics in the twentieth century are examples of this. In the case of Orthodox theology, that cannot happen.
All knowledge needed for salvation has been given us by Christ; the body of fundamental knowledge remains fixed and changeless. No radical discoveries about this knowledge are possible. However, a growth in the understanding of the application of that body of knowledge to our lives is possible, and that growth, that maturing, has characterized the history of Orthodoxy.


As the grave risk to life and limb that was associated with membership in the primitive Church abated in the early fourth century, it became safe, even fashionable, to belong to the Church. It was then that other methods for forging the spiritual character became an urgent necessity, and for this reason fasting took on an increased importance at that time. When one lives by day and by night under the terror of persecution; when crucifixion, burning alive, being devoured by wild animals, or being sentenced to a life of forced labor, are genuine possibilities for the followers of Christ; when one’s outlook is colored by continuous fear of the knock at the door—in those circumstances, it may be argued, the most rigorous type of fasting is not as indispensable as in more tranquil times.


Therefore, those who argue that we ought to return to the more primitive practice of fasting, in which it was somewhat less comprehensively regulated, should understand that if membership in Christ’s Church is to achieve anything positive for us at all, then with this less stringent regimen in fasting there must also come a desire for trials of the most severe kind elsewhere in our lives. If membership in Christ’s Church is to make us more like Christ, either one or the other is indispensable. Considered that way, we can see that fasting from animal products is not so difficult after all.


Now, let us enter more fully into the message of St. Paul’s words. In writing of the disputations in the early Roman Church between those who did not fast so strictly and those 
who did, St. Paul offers this admonition: Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him. Who art thou that judgest another man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. (Rom 14:3-4). What wonderfully beneficial words these are!


St. Paul is telling us that whatever fasting discipline others or we follow, the crucial thing is that we address the mat¬ter of our own relationship with our Master, Jesus Christ, and not judge the relationship of our neighbor with Him. When we each face the question as to whether we need to fast more stringently to strengthen our commitment to our Faith, our answer to that question, and the way our answer manifests itself in our lives, will ultimately be judged by the Master Whom we serve, when we stand before His dread judgment seat. So it is also in all the things we choose. It is not for us to make judgments about our Christian brothers and sisters. For several reasons we do not judge them:


1.      To judge another is to usurp the place of God; as St. Paul says: Who art thou that judgest'.
2.      To judge another is to take one’s focus off the place where it should be, and must be, to save one’s soul, which is on one’s own spiritual imperfections.
3.      To judge another is to incur the danger of an additional sin, misjudging, since we cannot see into another man’s heart and cannot know all of the circumstances of his life. St. Dorotheos of Gaza observes that while one can see another man’s sins, one cannot know about that man’s standing with God, about his secret prayers of supplication for mercy and forgiveness. You may well know about the sin, the great Saint writes, but you do not know about the repentance. (“Discourse and Sayings”)
4.      To judge another brings further dissension and strife into the Church, a place where peace and love should be the primary attributes.
5.      To judge another is to bring on the temptation of an even worse sin, one of the worst among sins, which is gossip.
6.      Finally, and most significantly, to judge another is to bring judgment upon ourselves; Christ Himself warned, judge not, and ye shall not be judged. (Lk 6:37).


We are repeatedly warned as Christians not to judge other men and women. Does this require that we completely abandon our critical faculties when it comes to our dealings with other people? If we should know of a man who is a notorious embezzler, do we do right in judging him unfit to be the custodian of the public treasury? If we should encounter a man whom we know to be a psychopathic murderer, do we properly judge it unwise to invite him over to dinner? The answer to both questions, obviously, is yes.
Let us take some less extreme and more likely examples. If we learn that a particular friend or companion exerts an un¬
healthy influence on us as Christians, or if we believe that a friend or companion of our children may lead those children astray, may we make the appropriate judgment in those cases and terminate such associations? Again, the answer is yes. Of course we may do that. We would be held accountable by Christ for not making these kinds of judgments.


What we are forbidden as Christians to do is to judge another person’s ultimate state before God, or to employ our critical faculties to enhance, in our own minds, our own rank or station or footing, in what we fancy are the eyes of God, at the expense of another human being. We are forbidden, in other words, to regard ourselves as “holy” by comparison with someone we regard as “sinful.” The Holy Gospel teaches us that 
Christ God judged the outwardly holy men of His country, the Pharisees, very harshly, while the Good Thief (a most unlikely candidate for salvation, one would think) was assured everlasting happiness. St. John of the Ladder declares that The beginning and sum of the passions... is unholy selfesteem. (Step 22).

Let us therefore not fasten our gaze upon the imagined inadequacies of other men and women during the Great Fast but examine with the most penetrating contemplation possible our own spiritual failures, that these may be swiftly amended. For most, if not all of us, that task is sufficient to fill a lifetime.


Orthodox - Heritage,  vol 16, issus 01-02

ON THE HERESY OF CHILIASM THE “THOUSAND YEAR REIGN” By Elder Cleopa of Romania, from “The Truth of Our Faith, ” ch. 16.






ON THE HERESY OF CHILIASM THE “THOUSAND YEAR REIGN”


By Elder Cleopa of Romania, from “The Truth of Our Faith, ” ch. 16.

Inquirer: There are those who maintain that between the Second Coming of the Lord and the end of the world Christ will reign upon the earth, governing, Himself, along with His elect for a thousand years. What is the truth of the matter, Father?
Elder Cleop a: This idea is an ancient one. In the first centuries of Christianity, the so-called Chiliasts or Millenialists endorsed it. Against them rose the entire ancient Church and its most important representatives.


The divine Fathers of the Church indicated in their writings that the one thousand year reign referred to in the book of Revelation signifies an infinite number of years, i.e., a kingdom that shall have no end. This we know well since from Holy Scripture it is clear that the Kingdom of Christ is not of this world. (Jn 18:36). In Holy Scripture it is clearly indicated that the Kingdom of Heaven is also the Kingdom of God or Kingdom of Christ, in so much as both Saint John the Forerunner and Christ Himself called it so. This Kingdom of Christ will be spiritual and will reign over the internal world of man, while externally being revealed in the righteousness, peace and joy of the Holy Spirit. (Rom 14:17). Christ Himself established this kingdom and explained in His parables how it will appear, whom it will include and what power it will possess. His reign will not endure for a thousand years, but eternally. (Lk 1:33). Its inhabitants will include all faithful Christians from all the peoples of the world. (Pss 116:1-2), it will reign over all creation, all people, nations, and languages, and it will be a kingdom of righteousness. (Dan 7:13-14). It will be a kingdom made up of souls (Mt. 28:18)—souls that have already entered and lived within it in this present life.


This kingdom of Christ, derived not from this world, constitutes the Church, or the Body, of Christ, of which the head is Christ Himself {Eph 1:22). The adoption and entrance into this kingdom takes place only through the laver of regeneration (Tit 3:5) or birth from above (Jn 3:3). No one can enter into this reign of God except through baptism (Rom 6:3), which is to say by being born again from above or being born of water and the Spirit, according to the word of the Saviour: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God (Jn 3:5). This heavenly birth by the power of the All-holy Spirit is a true resurrection from the dead (Col. 2:12-13), and hence the reason why Baptism is so often referred to as resurrection (Rom 6:3-5). Thus, also, it is that the Orthodox Christian baptism is a renaissance of life and a resurrection from the dead. When the Apostle Paul writes awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light, (Eph. 5:14) he has in mind precisely this internal regeneration and resurrection through Christian Baptism, for no one can enter the Kingdom of Christ unless he has first been brought out from among the dead by Christian Baptism.


Holy Scripture speaks to us about the thousand-year reign in prophetic and symbolic terms, corresponding to that which we spoke of above. Here is what Saint John the Evangelist says in his Revelation: And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season. And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgement was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheadedfor the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.


 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: andfire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night forever and ever. And I saw a great white throne, ana him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaver, fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I sau the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books wen opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which w-rewritten in the books, according to their works. And the sea g.;: -: up the dead which were in it; and death and hell deliverer^ the dead which were in them: and they were judged ever, ma n according to their works. And death and hell were cast into vre  lake of fire. This is the second death. (Rev. 20:1-14).


From this passage, we can ascertain the following: 

[1]       The thousand-year reign of Christ is a period in which Christ has bound the power of the Devil over men. (w. 1-2)

[2]       At the end of this period, the Devil will again be lord over men and oppress them, but only for a season, (v. 3)

[3]       The members of this kingdom will be those alone who do not submit to the beast and accept his engraved seal, and who have a part in the first resurrection, (w. 4-5)

[4]       Those who were not worthy of this resurrection will be raised at the end of the thousand years, that is at the second resurrection, as this resurrection, relative to the first, is the second, (v. 5)

[5]       Death will have no power over the sharers in the thou-sand-year reign, (v. 6)

[6]       At the end of these thousand years and after a grue- somely violent persecution against the saints, the devil and his followers will be cast into the lake of fire—the second death, (w. 4-15)
From this it should be abundantly clear that the thousand- year kingdom is nothing else but the Kingdom of God or Kingdom of Heaven, and this is clear seeing that:

[1]       In the period of this reign, the Devil was bound and loosed, receiving power over men. Christ entered into His dominion and bound the Devil, that is, by the redemption of humanity by His Blood He bound and restrained his power over mankind.

[2]       The entrance into this kingdom presupposes the first resurrection, that is, none other than holy baptism itself, often, in fact, called by the name of resurrection, or being born again from above or simply regeneration. This resurrection through baptism is the first, in comparison to the second, the general one, of the body, which is also called the last resurrection, as when Martha spoke to Christ concerning her brother: I know that he shall rise again at the resurrection on the Last Day. (Jn 11:24).

[3]       At the end of this kingdom or reign, the Devil will again be let loose to deceive the people and with power and mania to assault and oppress holy Christians in the person of the antichrist, the beast or false prophet. (Rev 13:1-11).
[4]       The duration of this period will be brief and yet it will constitute one of the signs signaling the immediacy of the Second Coming of Christ. (Mt 24:22; Rev 13:5, 20:3).


Therefore, it should be clearly known that the first resurrection is the baptismal resurrection and the second resurrection is that which we await on the last day, the last resurrection. Furthermore, it should also be clear that the first death is the tatural one or the separation of the soul from the body, while he second death is the eternal torment (of hell) (Mt 18:8), so ailed due to its opposition to the blessed life of eternity. (Jn:24ft It should also be clear that this second death has no ower over those made worthy of the first resurrection. Like- use, from this it follows that the first death, from which not ren the saints are delivered, is the natural or bodily death.

In Holy Scripture someone’s sinful condition is also compared to a kind of death. It is with this meaning that the Saviour says to one of His disciples who had asked leave to first go and bury his father, Follow me, and let the dead bury their dead. (Mt 8:22). Likewise does He speak with this in mind when saying, He that believeth in Me, though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. (Jn 11:25). The Apostle also had this meaning in mind when he wrote, reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord (Rom 6:11, 8:10). Moreover, with this meaning as well is it written to the angel of the Church in Sardis: I know thy works, and that thou hast a name that thou livest, but thou art dead. (Rev. 3:1).


Although the duration of the reign of Christ is designated on the whole as a thousand years, we should understand this to signify an era immeasurable and undesignated. Therefore, its length is nothing else except the period between the first and second comings of the Lord, or more precisely, the period of the consolidation of the Kingdom of God until His Second Coming. This is the explanation of the Kingdom of God and its duration upon this earth.
Inquirer: Father, recently I had a very disturbing conversation with some people concerning this question and came away with the opinion that the thousand-year reign could only be understood in earthly terms. This might be the case seeing that it will be inaugurated at the Second Coming; it will be preceded by the resurrection of the righteous who in turn will reign with Christ for a thousand years; and after which will occur the resurrection of sinners, the judgement and the end of the world.
This interpretation seems to me to proceed from the twentieth chapter of Revelation that you read earlier. It can be deduced from that chapter that there will be final resurrections: the first resurrection of the righteous at the beginning of the thousand years and the second resurrection of the sinful at the end of world, (w. 4-5)


During the period of a thousand years the active power of the Devil will be restricted up until just before the end when, after a brief but horrible flurry of aggression, he will be thrown into Hades together with all of his servants (w. 7-14). Afterward, they will be resurrected, judged and condemned to eternal punishment (w. 12-15). After the first period, we will pass through to the end of the world (v. n). This is, for example, what the Apostle Paul says when writing to the Christians of Thessalonica: For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first (Thess 4:14-16). Consequently, at His Second Coming Christ will raise those who have died faithful to Him, i.e. those that, as the Apostle says, shall rise first, hence the first resurrection.

 The resurrection of the dead, or the second resurrection, will follow later—He does not tell us exactly when—but according to Revelation, it will be after a thousand years. Listen to what Saint Paul says about this: But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. (Cor 15:23). In other words, the Just join the choir of the Righteous at the beginning of the thousand-year reign and the sinful an assembly of their own at the end of the thousand-year period. Is this not the truth of matter, Father?


Elder Cleopa: As I explained to you earlier, the True Church of Christ understands the millennium of Holy Scripture mystically and symbolically to mean an indeterminate number of years. Do you think that Scripture only in this passage speaks in a mystical and veiled manner, or could it be that many hard to comprehend subjects are approached in this way? Are there not, in fact, many mystical, symbolic and allegorical expressions or events that cannot be explained literally but carry exalted and spiritual meanings often completely different from that readily apparent? How can we explain the book of Revelation literally, when it is bound with seven seals? (Rev. 5:1) What is the red horse that is like unto fire} (Rev 6:4). In addition, what of the seven angels who were given seven plagues? (Rev. 15:1-7) How should we understand them?



There are those who speak of two resurrections at the end of the world, and thus, according to them, somehow a third coming of the Lord must take place. However, such a thing is surely not true. It was shown above that, the first resurrection is realized through Christian baptism and the second is the last or general resurrection (of the body). Saint John the Evangelist renders precisely the words of the Saviour concerning the two resurrections: Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passedfrom death unto life. Verily, verily, I say unto you, 

The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. (Jn. 5:24-25). As this passage concerns, the resurrection of those who will hear the voice of the Son of God, i.e. that resurrection which now is, this cannot be interpreted as referring to the last resurrection, but only to the present resurrection of those who are raised from the death of sin to the life of Christ, to the new life of Christian faith entered, as the Apostle and Evangelist himself relates elsewhere, through Christian baptism. (Jn 5:24-25). 


This is the first resurrection referred to in the book of Revelation.
Further, on the Saviour speaks about another kind of resurrection, a resurrection that even now is and yet will, however, happen at the end of the world, which is not of the soul but of the body, and specifically of the dead in the graves. Marvel
not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. (Jn 5:28-29). In other words, marvel not at the power of Christ to raise spiritually (i.e. in the first resurrection), for indeed He will raise all the dead from the graves as well. This passage excludes outright the possibility of their being a period of a thousand years between the resurrection of the righteous and the resurrection of the sinful, for it shows clearly that the last or general resurrection is one and only and will happen to all. This is the second resurrection. As for the first, we saw that it is that resurrection which now is, the present resurrection, and not the general or last.
Thus, through an analysis and comparison of the passages of Holy Scripture, we see how their meaning is clarified and elucidated, and how the possibility of an interpolation of a one thousand-year period between the two resurrections is ruled out. According to the teaching of the true Church of Christ, the one thousand-year period should be understood as extending between the first resurrection, which happens in Christian baptism, and the second or last resurrection.


This is, in fact, what we find in Saint Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians (Thess 4:14-16), where he speaks only of one resurrection and not a second or last resurrection. It is true that here Saint Paul is referring to the resurrection of the Just who have fallen asleep in the Lord and not to the resurrection of sinners. However, this is not because they will be raised later, after a thousand years, but simply because the Apostle Paul and his listeners are only concerned about the fate of those asleep in Christ. The fact that he makes no reference to sinners does not mean that they will be raised a thousand years later. The Apostle is not in the least concerned here with other questions, for his aim in this epistle is to comfort his readers (v. 18), that they be not sorrowful, anxious or in ignorance, concerning the fate of those reposed in Christ.
In his first epistle to the Corinthians (15:23), Saint Paul speaks of there being orders. 

The Chiliasts wrongly interpret this passage as referring only to two orders, namely of the Just and of the sinful, whose resurrections will be separated by a period of one thousand years. In truth, Saint Paul is speaking here of many orders, analogous to the degree of holiness or sinfulness {for one differeth from another in glory—see w. 39-41) with which they will be revealed.


Holy Scripture is explicit and categorical in many places concerning the Second Coming of Christ, namely, that it will be one single date for all, righteous and sinners alike, without there being a period of one thousand years between the resurrection and judgement of some and that of others. The Saviour said: For the hour is coming, in which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. (Jn 5:28-29). Hence, there will be one voice alone announcing the resurrection of all. In another place the Lord also says: When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world... Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire ... (Mt 25:31-46).


Here the Saviour speaks with precision and clarity concerning His Second Coming and future judgement. In this most glorious parable He communicates the following certainty: there will be one harvest for the wheat and the tares alike (Mt 13:30, 42-43), the Bridegroom will come for all the virgins at one and the same time (Mt 25:1-13), and in the same hour will a reckoning be sought for the work done by the servants entrusted with the talents. (Mt 25:14-30). Therefore, one is the last advent of Christ, one the resurrection and appearance of all before the King and Judge, and one the judgement of mankind. Inquirer; I read in a “brochure” that the date of the beginning of the millennium can be determined, and that it will not be identical with the date of the Second Coming, and that it represents the end of the era of idol-worship. Does this have any validity?


Elder Cleopa: First, know with absolute assurance that there does not exist any such millennium with the meaning conveyed in that “brochure.” If the date of the Second Coming of Christ cannot be determined, as neither the angels nor even the Son of Man, as man, have been informed of it (Mt 24:36-44), then surely neither can the date of the beginning of the millennium be determined.
We know that in that which pertains to salvation, the history of the world can only be divided into two periods: that of the Old Testament and that of the New Testament. Another age will begin with the Second Coming of our Lord, but this will be the last and everlasting age. In the history of the world, there existed other lesser episodes, which subdivided the two great periods without thereby constituting two or three more periods. Ages or epochs that we have with this meaning include that of the patriarchs, the apostles, the persecutions and so on.
Concerning the passages of the Old Testament, these cannot be understood as if they were magical, but are either factual or symbolic like the book from which they are derived. How can someone know that the six days of creation were, in actuality, some seven thousand years and that they each represent a great duration of time for humanity or even one thousand years?

Nowhere does it say in Holy Scripture that one day is equal to one thousand years, but only that before the creation of the visible world time did not exist. Time, for God, is neither fixed nor appointed, but, rather, one day before God is considered as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day or as a night watch (2Pet 3:8). It does not follow from this that any figures presented within Holy Scripture represent a certain number of days, which we then reckon as years.
Inquirer: With respect to that which is said in the Symbol of our Faith [The Nicene - Constantinople Creed, 325 and 381 A.D.] In addition, His kingdom shall have no end, the Chiliasts say that the Lord will come before the Future Judgement to rule with them a thousand years, and that afterward he will raise the sinners to be judged. Isn’t it true that the Lord will rule endlessly after the final judgement?
Elder Cleopa: The True Church tells us that the kingdom of the Lord will have no end. The Reign of Jesus Christ, as man, and His Glory will never come to an end, but will endure eternally. For, on the one hand, Jesus is not only human, from whom God could someday take His glory, while on the other hand as the Son of God He will never deny His human nature. His being a Man, so filled with divine glory, will never come to an end.
The holy Archangel Gabriel announced the everlasting Reign of Jesus Christ in advance. It is true, as Saint Paul says, that Christ will be subjected in everything to the Father and afterward that He will subject everything to Himself. Yet, this means the submission of the entire world before the Father and the cessation of His redemptive activity (Cor. 15:25-28), as it is His own work, which He assumed at His incarnation.
So, let the Chiliasts know that they cannot make human calculations and determinations for mysteries that are unknown to the angels, and even, in His humanity, to the Son of God Himself.



Elder Cleopa (+1998)


Orthodox - Heritage,  vol 16, issus 01-02

Βασιλική Αθ. Παπαμιχαήλ εκ Πατρών:《Το αειμνηστο ιερατικό ζεύγος Πέττα στηρίζουν τον παιδί μου που γεννήθηκε με σύνδρομο down》.

Πόσο μεγάλη δόξα εν ούρανοίς αξιώθηκε ό άγιος Συμεών ό Θεοδόχος, ό όποιος κράτησε στα χέρια του το Σωτήρα του κόσμου! Τούτο φαίνεται ολοκάθαρα από το ακόλουθο περιστατικό από τον βίο του αγίου Πέτρου του Αθωνίτου (12 Ιουνίου).





Πόσο μεγάλη δόξα εν ούρανοίς αξιώθηκε ό άγιος  Συμεών ό Θεοδόχος, ό όποιος κράτησε στα χέρια του το Σωτήρα του κόσμου!

Τούτο φαίνεται ολοκάθαρα από το ακόλουθο περιστατικό από τον βίο του αγίου Πέτρου του Αθωνίτου (12 Ιουνίου).

 Ό Πέτρος ήταν στρατηγός και κατά τη διάρκεια μιας μάχης συνελήφθη, αλυσοδέθηκε και φυλακίστηκε στην πόλη Σαμάρα, στις όχθες του ποταμού Ευφράτη. Για μεγάλο χρονικό διάστημα έλιωνε στη φυλακή και στο τέλος άρχισε να ικετεύει με δάκρυα τον άγιο Νικόλαο, να πρεσβεύει στον Θεό ώστε να απελευθερωθεί από τη, φυλακή• μάλιστα υποσχέθηκε ν’ αφιερωθεί ολοκληρωτικά στον Θεό. Πράγματι ό άγιος Νικόλαος φανερώθηκε στον Πέτρο σε όνειρο και του είπε πώς, μολονότι προσευχήθηκε γι’ αυτόν, ό Θεός ανέβαλε να επιτρέψει την απελευθέρωση, διότι αύτός (ό Πέτρος) είχε ξαναδώσει στο παρελθόν παρόμοια υπόσχεση αφιέρωσης και δεν την είχε  τηρήσει.

 Επιπλέον ό άγιος Νικόλαος τον συμβούλευε να προσευχηθεί στον άγιο Συμεών τον Θεοδόχο, ό όποιος «έχει μεγάλη παρρησία ενώπιον του Θεού και ίσταται κοντά στον θρόνο του Θεού μαζί με την Παναγία και τον άγιο Ιωάννη τον Πρόδρομο». Ό Πέτρος έλαβε ύπ' όψιν του την παραίνεση του άγιου Νικολάου και προσευχήθηκε θερμά. 
Παρουσιάστηκε τότε πάλι ό άγιος μάζι με τον άγιο Συμεών όχι πια σε όνειρο, άλλα στην πραγματικότητα.

Ό Πέτρος είδε το Συμεών μέσα σε δόξα και φως που έλαμπε από το πρόσωπό του, ενδεδυμένο τα άμφια των ιερέων της Παλαιάς Διαθήκης, με χρυσή αρχιερατική ράβδο ανά χείρας. Ό άγιος Συμεών είπε στον Πέτρο: «Θέλεις να εκπληρώσεις την υπόσχεσή σου και να γίνεις μοναχός;».

 Εκείνος απάντησε: «Ναί, δέσποτα, με τη βοήθεια του Θεού». Τότε ό Συμεών άγγιξε τις αλυσίδες του Πέτρου με τη ράβδο του και οι αλυσίδες έλιωσαν σαν κερί. Ύστερα, ανοίγοντας τις θύρες της φυλακής, ό άγιος Συμεών τον οδήγησε έξω από αυτήν.

ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.

Διά πρεσβειών, Κύριε, τού Αγαπητού Σου πρεσβύτου, άγιου Συμεών, τού θαυμαστού Θεοδόχου. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΒΕΛΙΜΙΟΒΙΤΣ.



 Παντοδύναμε Κύριε, ελέησον και σώσον - μη σβήσεις με τον θάνατο αυτή τη μικρή φλόγα!

Το παιδί αυτό είναι σαν τη φλογίτσα ενός κεριού, και οι άνεμοι τού κόσμου είναι φοβεροί, ενάντιοι ακόμη και για τ' άστρα.

Μια αδύναμη φωτιά κάτω από τις στάχτες σβήνει, όπως και μια ανθρώπινη ψυχή μπορεί κάτω άπ’ το χέρι Σου να σβήσει.

Όταν το νερό ανεβαίνει και φθάνει μέχρι τον λαιμό, και ή φλόγα τρεμοσβήνει και ή φωτιά νοτίζετε, ώ Κύριε, σώσε, ελέησε και παρηγόρησή μας! 

Έτσι προσευχόταν σε Σένα ό προφήτης Δαβίδ.

Μολονότι ήταν λύχνος παμφαέστατος, όμως στις παρυφές του ουρανού ήταν ένα αδύναμο παιδί, και από πονηρές επιθυμίες βασανιζόταν στον πόνο και από πονηρούς λογισμούς το κεφάλι του πονούσε- κάθε άνεμος κακίας τον έκανε και πιο αδύναμο.

Θά είχε σβηστεί γρήγορα από τούς σφοδρούς ανέμους αν δεν τον είχες σώσει Εσύ, Βοήθεια Τάχιστη, ώ Κύριε, ελέησε και σώσε μας, έστω και τώρα, την ύστατη ώρα, και μη σβήνεις με το θάνατο αυτή τη μικρή φλόγα! 
Διά πρεσβειών, Κύριε, τού Αγαπητού Σου πρεσβύτου, άγιου Συμεών, τού θαυμαστού Θεοδόχου. 

ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.   ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.

ΑΓΙΟΣ ΣΥΜΕΩΝ Ο ΘΕΟΔΟΧΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΒΕΛΙΜΙΟΒΙΤΣ.



ΑΓΙΟΣ ΣΥΜΕΩΝ Ο ΘΕΟΔΟΧΟΣ.



Ό πρεσβύτης Συμεών έπελέγη επί βασιλείας του Αιγυπτίου αυτοκράτορα Πτολεμαίου Φιλαδέλφου ως ένας από τους περίφημους Εβδομήκοντα σοφούς, στους οποίους ανατέθηκε το μείζον έργο τις μεταφράσεως της Βίβλου από τα Εβραϊκά στα Ελληνικά. Ό Συμεών επιτελούσε ευσυνείδητα την αποστολή του αύτή, άλλα κατά τη διαδικασία της μεταφράσεως τού Βιβλίου του Προφήτη Ησαΐα, έφθασε στο επίμαχο εδάφιο της προφητείας: Ιδού ή παρθένος εν γαστρι έξει και τέξεται υιόν, και καλέσεις το όνομα αυτού Εμμανουήλ (Ήσ. 7:14). Αυτό του προκάλεσε σύγχυση και, στην αμηχανία του, πήρε ένα μαχαιρίδιο γιά να αφαιρέσει τη λέξη «παρθένος» και να την αντικαταστήσει με την ελληνική λέξη «νεάνις». Αμέσως όμως άγγελος του Θεού παρουσιάστηκε και εμπόδισε τον Συμεών από το εγχείρημα αυτό, εξηγώντας του ότι ή προφητεία ήταν αληθής και ορθά γραμμένη. Ό αγγελιαφόρος του Θεού είπε ακόμη ότι ό ίδιος ό Συμεών θά βεβαίωνε του λόγου το αληθές, διότι, σύμφωνα με το θέλημα του Θεού, δεν επρόκειτο να πεθάνει προτού να δει τον Μεσαία, τον εκ της Παρθένου γεννηθέντα. 

Ό δίκαιος Συμεών αγαλλίασε στο άκουσμα μιας τέτοιας φωνής εξ ουρανού, άφησε αμετάβλητη τη διατύπωση της προφητείας και δόξασε τον Θεό πού τον αξίωσε να ζήσει και να δει τον Έπηγγελμένο. Όταν το παιδίον Ιησούς παρουσιάστηκε στο Ναό της Ιερουσαλήμ από την Παρθένο Μαρία, το Πνεύμα του Θεού το αποκάλυψε στο Συμεών, ό όποιος ήταν πρεσβύτης υπέργηρος και «λευκός ως κύκνος». Ό Συμεών εισήρθε δρομαίος στον Ναό και εκεί αναγνώρισε τόσο την Παρθένο, όσο και το Παιδίον, από το φως πού σαν φωτοστέφανο περιέλαμπε τα κεφάλια τους. Ό ευτυχής Συμεών βάσταξε τον Χριστό στα χέρια του και προσευχήθηκε στο Θεό να τον πάρει απ’ αύτήν τη ζωή: Νϋν απολύεις τον δούλο σου Δέσποτα, κατά το ρήμα σου εν ειρήνη ότι ειδον οι οφθαλμοί μου το σωτήριόν σου (Λουκ. 2:29). Παρίστατο επίσης ή προφήτις Άννα, θυγατέρα του Σαμουήλ και αύτή αναγνώρισε τον Μεσσία και Τον κήρυξε στον λαό. Ή άγια Άννα ήταν τότε 84 ετών. Ό άγιος Συμεών ύστερα από λίγο πέθανε. Ό δίκαιος πρεσβύτης θεωρείται  προστάτης των μικρών παιδιών.

ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.   ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.


ΓΕΡΟΝΤΑΣ ΣΙΣΩΗΣ ΔΟΧΕΙΑΡΙΤΗΣ

Οἱ πολέμοι ποὺ θὰ ξεκινήσουν στὶς ἄλλες χῶρες, θὰ ἀναχαιτίσουν τὴν κατεδάφιση τῆς Ρωμηοσύνης..!


Το φως της Εκκλησίας. Με τον μητροπολίτη Αντώνιο του Σουρόζ


ΑΓΆΠΗ ΑΣΚΗΣΗ ΤΑΠΕΙΝΩΣΗ....

Mount Tabor, Israel

Kfar Nahum, Sea of Galilee


ΕΊΠΕ ΓΈΡΩΝ. ΑΜΑ ΤΑ ΧΑΛΑΣΕΙΣ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΘΕΟ ΘΑ ΣΕ ΣΥΜΦΙΛΙΩΣΕΙ Ο ΠΝΕΥΜΑΤΙΚΟΣ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΘΕΟ. ΑΝ ΤΑ ΧΑΛΑΣΕΙΣ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΝΕΥΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΠΟΙΟΣ ΘΑ ΣΕ ΣΥΜΦΙΛΙΩΣΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΘΕΟ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΠΝΕΥΜΑΤΙΚΟ;


ΟΙ ΕΧΘΡΟΙ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΕΧΘΡΟΙ ΑΛΛΑ ΣΚΛΗΡΟΙ ΦΙΛΟΙ. ΑΓΙΟΣ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.

Byzantine troops defending the walls of Constantinople against the crusaders- by Łukasz Mieszkowski

ΗΛΕΚΤΡΟΝΙΚΟΣ ΥΠΟΛΟΓΙΣΤΉΣ..

Συγχώρα με Χριστέ μου, κάπου εκεί, στού δρόμου την γωνιά, Βαδίζοντας πρός Γολγοθά... ''Εχω αφήσει τον σταυρό μου...''

ΠΟΛΕΜΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑΝΑΣΤΕΥΣΗ.

ΜΜΕ....

Ὁ Σεβασμιώτατος Μητροπολίτης Κυθήρων κ. Σεραφείμ παραχωρεί σπίτια σε πολύτεκνες οικογένειες ΑΞΙΟΣ

Οι πολυχρονισμοί των αρχιερέων, "εις πολλά έτη", έχουν μια στενή σχέση με τους πολυχρονισμούς των αυτοκρατόρων στο Βυζάντιο. Πολυχρονισμοί λέγονταν στα Ανάκτορα ή στον Ιππόδρομο όπου τελοσπάντων λάμβανε χώρα επίσημη παράσταση του αυτοκράτορα. Ο πολυχρονισμοί ωστόσο δεν ήταν ανατολική εφεύρεση: ανάγονται στην εποχή της αυτοκρατορικής Ρώμης -πριν δηλαδή ο Χριστιανισμός αναγνωριστεί ως θρησκεία της Αυτοκρατορίας. Στη πορεία του χρόνου και με την άλωση της Πόλης, οι πολυχρονισμοί αποδόθηκαν στον Πατριάρχη του Γένους, αφού αυτοκράτορας έπαψε να υπάρχει. Σιγά σιγά, ο πολυχρονισμός άρχισε να ψάλλεται στον κάθε αρχιερέα κι απ' τον κάθε αρχιερέα στον κάθε λειτουργό πρεσβύτερο. Βέβαια, αντίστοιχους πολυχρονισμούς επιζήτησαν και οι Φράγκοι στη Δυτική τους Αυτοκρατορία. Προτάσσεται λοιπόν ο ύμνος "ο Χριστός Νικά, ο Χριστός Βασιλεύει, ο Χριστός Θριαμβεύει" (Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus Imperat) με μιαν επιθυμία ταύτισης της Βασιλείας του Χριστού μ' εκείνη των Φράγκων Αυτοκρατόρων (κάτι βέβαια που γίνεται στην Αναστολή εξίσου). Έπειτα, ακολουθούν ικεσίες στη Θεοτόκο, στους Αγίους Αποστόλους και Αγίους Προστάτες της Δύσης σ' έναν διάλογο που μεγαλύνει το πρόσωπο του δυτικού αυτοκράτορα. Στις μέρες μας, με τη διάλυση των αυτοκρατοριών και τη δημιουργία των εθνικών κρατών, το μεγαλυνάριο του αυτοκράτορα επιβιώνει. Ωστόσο, όπως και στην Ανατολή, πλέον μεγαλύνεται μόνο ο Επίσκοπος της Ρώμης αφού αυτοκράτορες εν γένει δεν υπάρχουν πια.

ΠΕΡΊΟΔΟΣ ΤΡΙΩΔΙΟΥ.

Το χειρότερο πράγμα στην πίστη είναι να έχει μια θρησκευτική εμφάνιση, και στη Σωτηρία - το πρόσχημα της αγιοσύνης  Μοναχός Συμεών του Άθω



Το χειρότερο πράγμα στην πίστη είναι να έχει μια θρησκευτική εμφάνιση, και στη Σωτηρία - το πρόσχημα της αγιοσύνης 

Μοναχός Συμεών του Άθω

Ο Θεός δεν περιορίζει τον άνθρωπο με κανένα τρόπο, ο άνθρωπος περιορίζει τον εαυτό του. "Αυτός που σπέρνει φειδωλά θα θερίσει και με φειδώ" (2 Κορινθίους 9: 6).  Ο Μοναχός Συμεών του Άθω