Orthodox - Heritage, vol 16, issus 01-02
Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου
Πέμπτη 1 Φεβρουαρίου 2018
WATCHFULNESS, PRAYER AND HOLY CONFESSION.A homily by Elder Ephraim of Filotheou and Arizona
WATCHFULNESS, PRAYER AND HOLY CONFESSION
A homily by Elder Ephraim of Filotheou and Arizona,
translated from the Greek by Fr. Seraphim Bell, pastor of St. Silouan the
Athonite Orthodox Church in Walla Walla, WA.
My beloved children,
Today we will say a few things about the great virtue
of watchfulness.
As you know, watchfulness is a patristic teaching, it
is the experience of the great neptic fathers of the Church and of the desert.
The word nepsis comes from nepho, which means to be sleepless, to guard, to inspect,
examine, watch over, keep under surveillance. All these things the fathers sum
up in one continuous attention to the nous. Watchfulness is described as the
axe which shatters the large trees, hitting their roots. And when the root is
struck, it doesn’t spring up again. Thus also when the nous of the man, of the
Christian, has heed for the soul, it keeps watch over the heart and the five
senses of the soul, the bodily as well as the spiritual. When the nous is
awake, when it is attentive, when it keeps watch over the speculations, the
thoughts, when it controls the imagination, then the whole man, body and soul,
is kept pure. And when the man is rendered pure through watchfulness and
spiritual works, his prayers have boldness before God, they cross the sky, they
go beyond the stars, they pass through the heavens and draw near to the Divine
Throne of Grace, where the blessings of God are granted. And this being the
case, the man at prayer is enriched by the grace of God.
The neptic fathers tell us that one of our thoughts
may rise to heaven and another may descend to hell. By our thoughts we are
improved or defiled. In other words, a thought which may inattentively attack
us, may pollute us, may pleasure us, and is able to render us worthy of hell. A
heavenly thought, a thought of self-denial, a brave thought a thought of prayer
and the vision of God, makes us worthy to draw near the Divine throne and to
taste of heavenly things. By the thoughts either we will become unclean or we
will become better. The beginning of sins starts with the thoughts.
The thoughts come from the five senses, the spiritual
as well as the physical. When we allow the sense of sight to be un¬controlled
and it carelessly sees anything, this carelessness will become no end of dirty
and sinful images. Since these images are placed in the imagination, afterwards
they drip the poison
of sinful pleasure inside the heart of man. This
pleasure is the poison, by which the heart is polluted and then becomes unclean
and guilty before the unsleeping eye of God. Just like the sense of sight, so
it is also of touch, and also of taste and hearing and of smell. And so the
five senses create analogous sinful images, which render the man unclean before
the face of God. Here rests the entire philosophy of the spirit.
All sermons are beneficial, exactly because when a
tree which is diseased is pruned, it is cleansed, and thus the word of God
helps in the reduction of a passion. However, the teaching of the Fathers
concerning watchfulness radically effects the cleansing from the passions. When
the mattock, when the axe strikes the root, the entire tree falls down, it
withers and is finished. So also when watchfulness takes a place in the life of
the Christian, a tree of passion falls, it withers and thus in time, the old
man, the man of sin and of passion, the earthly Adam is freed and he becomes a
new man. For this reason, the neptic work frees us radically from evil. Here
then we must give heed to our life. If we want to cleanse ourselves, we should
make sure to enrich our nous by the application of watchfulness.
A part of watchfulness is also noetic prayer. The
vision of God is another part of watchfulness. Spiritual warfare is also
another part. All these parts, when they are united in an effort of man, in
time bring about holiness.
Abba Paphnoutios, a great desert father, was going
along one day on his way and there he saw two men committing some sin. The
thought of his passion said: “Look what great evil they are doing!” The eye saw
them and immediately the thought flared up, trying thereby to attack the purity
of the saint’s soul by judging the brother or also by his being tempted. Having
watchfulness, however, he was being vigilant, immediately his mind was
enlightened and he said to his thought, “They are sinning today, I will sin
tomorrow. They will repent, but I know myself to be a hard man, unrepentant,
egotistical, and thus, I won’t repent. I will be punished since I am worse than
these two. And what do I have to do about these careless sinners, since I am a
much greater sinner and more passionate?” And speaking in this manner and
putting a lock on the provocation of sin, he was saved and didn’t judge the
brothers who were sinning.
He didn’t go very far and an Angel of God appeared
before him having a double-edged cutless dripping blood; in other words, a
knife which had cut from both sides and he says to him:
“Paphnoutios, you see this knife? Do you see that it
is drip-ping blood?”
“I see it Angel of God.”
“With this knife I kill by taking the heads of the
ones who judge their neighbors. And since you didn’t judge, you didn’t condemn
those who were in fact sinning—not imagining or guessing that they were
sinners, but seeing them sin
with your own eyes—but you condemned yourself more,
for this reason your name has been written in the book of eternal life.”
Success. His name is written in eternal life, because
he didn’t judge the sinners, he didn’t condemn the sin of his brother. He would
have judged if he hadn’t had watchfulness, if he hadn’t been vigilant
noetically in guarding his soul. Do you see what good attention he produced?
And do you see what harm he would have suffered, if he had been inattentive to
the thought and allowed it to work within him! But his thought said that they
were in fact sinning, he saw them. In spite of these things, however, even
though the thought was spoken to him, the correct thought triumphed and thereby
he escaped the shipwreck of his soul.
All of the passions have their own images, their own
fan-tasies and their own pleasures. Murder has one image and another pleasure,
gluttony has another and so many other sinful passions have others. Ail of the
pleasures are otherwise poisons which bring about the death of the soul.
We must
take as our view that, if we want to clean the “inside of the cup,” the
interior of the soul, our heart, this center of man, we must strive to keep
watchful. We should take care to become better, that is, we should be vigilant
to always have our hand on the trigger. With the first appearance of the enemy,
we should shoot. As soon as an evil thought comes to us, immediately knock it
down. A dirty image comes, immediately spoil it. We shouldn’t allow it to
become more vivid in colors and in appearance, because thereby we will come to
immediate difficulty. When the evil is struck at the root, it is impossible to
sprout and to increase. When this struggle comes about with diligence, we will
cleanse our soul and thereby we will be found clean and with boldness before
God.
A pagan priest asked some monks:
“Does your God appear to you? Do you see Him? Does he
speak to you?”
The fathers said:
“No.”
The pagan says:
“If he doesn’t speak to you and doesn’t appear to you,
this means that you don’t have pure thoughts. When I pray, my God answers me.”
Naturally, God didn’t answer the pagan, the demons answered
him, but nevertheless the fathers took it as an occasion of benefit and said:
“Indeed, the impure thoughts prevent man from communicating
with God.”
Watchfulness does nothing less than cleanse the nous
and the heart from every impurity. For this reason, with a little ascetical
toil, watchfulness brings about the greatest spiritual results. When we strive
ascetically and aren’t mindful of our thoughts, we accomplish nothing.
The Sacred Chrysostomos wrote many chapters about
prayer and about wakefulness. And in the midst of them he says something very
beautiful:
Prayer, he says, is enlightenment of the soul, true
consciousness of God, a mediator between God and man, a physician of the
passions, an antidote against diseases, medicine against every illness,
tranquility of the soul, a guide which carries us to heaven, which doesn’t
revolve around the earth, which marches towards the apse of heaven. It passes
over the buildings, it passes mentally through the air, it walks above the air,
it passes over the whole of the stars, it opens the gates of heaven, it
surpasses the angels, it transcends the Thrones and Principalities, it passes
over the Cherubim and when it has passed through all of the foundation of
nature, it comes near to the unapproachable Trinity. There it worships the
Divinity. There it is made worthy to become an interlocutor in the Heavenly
Kingdom. Through this (theprayer), the
soul, which is lifted up in the air to the heavens, embraces the Lord in an
inexpressible manner, exactly as the baby embraces its mother and with tears
cries loudly, desiring the enjoyment of divine milk. But it seeks the things
which are necessary and receives a gift superior to all visible nature.
Prayer is our venerable representative. It gladdens
the heart. It gives rest to the soul. It creates within us thefear of the
punishment of hell, the desire for the Kingdom of Heaven. It teaches humility,
it grants awareness of sin and in general it adorns man with every good thing,
like a robe adorned with all the virtues which enfolds the soul. It brought a
gift to Anna, Samuel, and it made known that Prophet of the Lord. This prayer
also made Elias a zealot of the Lord. And it became a guide for the descent of
the heavenly fire for the sacrifice. For while the priest of Baal was calling
all day long to the idol, he, after he Lifted up his voice which came from his
pure heart and cried out through his mouth and his soul, the fire came down from
heaven as a sign of the righteousness of his prayer. Since he was standing like
an eagle over the altar with his fierce nature, he offered everything as a
sacrifice. But the great servant of God, the zealot Elias, did this, as all
that happened then, teaching us by the spirit, that we also crying loudly from
the depths of our soul to God, should move the ineffablefire of the Holy Spirit
to come down to the altar of our heart and to offer ourselves fully as a
sacrifice to God.
All of the great fathers of the Church, especially the
fathers of the desert, succeeded in becoming worthy of great gifts exclusively
and only with watchfulness and vision of God (,theoria). Keeping vigil all
night and coming to the vision of the Light of God.
We have St. Gregory Palamas, the instructor of the
desert, the instructor of neptic activity, the teacher of noetic prayer. This
saint would remain enclosed in his cell for the entire week. He didn’t go
outside at all. There on his knees and with hands upraised, he was vigilant
about his nous and his heart and he received heavenly theology (literally
“theology from above”—trans.) by the Holy Spirit. The theology which
made known the Uncreated Light of the Divine Glory, of
the Divine Nature.
The Uncreated Light is the glory of the Divine Nature.
There was the goal and the conclusion of asceticism and of prayer. When the
saints received this Light, they became all Light. And since the light floods
the nous and the heart, how could they know less than the mysteries of the
secrets which are known only to the angels? Through watchfulness the fathers
attained to the pinnacle of the virtues and of the graces.
And we, if we are watchful, if we pray, even if we are
in the world, and even if we don’t attain to similar states, no matter what, we
will attain to a condition of purity. When we succeed by watchfulness in not
judging our brother, this is no small achievement. We put into practice the
commandment of our Christ, which is as follows: Do not judge, that you be not
judged. For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged, and with what
measure you mete, it shall be measured to you. (Mt 7:1-2).
It is the commandment of Christ. It is not the commandment
of some saint. It is God’s. And therefore we have put into practice a Divine commandment.
When we do not judge, we will not be judged. Judge, and we will be judged. Sin
is widespread. Wherever we turn our eyes and our imagination, we recognize the
errors of men. Therefore, if we are inattentive, without watchfulness, we will
always be found in the error of violation of this evangelical commandment of
not judging our neighbor.
There was a monk in some monastery. The tempter had
conquered him in negligence. He didn’t do his canon, he didn’t got to church,
he didn’t do his rule of prayer, and thus the fathers didn’t know him and
regarded him as negligent. The hour of death came and the fathers drew near him
to see something, which perhaps God would show, in order that they may be
benefited. Drawing near to the dying negligent monk, the fathers saw that he
was very joyful. They were perplexed and they said in their thoughts:
“Look, why is he peaceful? The negligence which he had
in his life doesn’t worry him? What happened to the debts which have been
gathered because of sloth? His conscience doesn’t rebel? It doesn’t make him
worry? He doesn’t despair?”
He continued to be joyful. They compelled him to
answer their question:
“Forgive us, brother, we see you doing so-so. We know
and you know that you lived in negligence and sloth in monastic duties. Now you
are heading to the judgment of Christ, and you should be somewhat sorry,
worried, etc. But we see you otherwise, joyful, peaceful, with hope and we
question; what supports this condition of yours?”
He answered them and said:
“You are right, my fathers, that’s how it is. I was
negligent and didn’t do what you did, but one thing I guarded in my life: not
to judge my brother. I read in the Holy Gospel,
where the Lord says that the one who does not judge,
will not be judged. Thus I tried, at least, not to judge. And I hope in the
mercy of God that I will not be judged. For this reason I am departing with
faith that God will apply his word.”
The fathers looked into it among themselves and said
that in fact the brother was very clever and masterfully gained his salvation.
If we are watchful, we will not criticize. For with
the offense of judging, immediately watchfulness will set up a barrier and the
thought of judgment will be prevented from continuing. Then will happen what
took place with Abba Paphnoutios. And so we will escape from the sin of judging
and of criticism of the tongue and our names will be written in eternal life. A
man who keeps his tongue pure, both inner and outer, that is to say, the inner
thought and the tongue, and does this in the knowledge of God, this is a
guarantee that he is saved.
This spiritual attention becomes light and as light,
illumines the path.
And an illumined path of watchfulness is also a path to
sacred confession. The attention illumines it, which urges the man to settle
his account with God. And he is guided by the light of watchfulness to this
great mystery and there he deposits the entire debt, all the uncleanness of sins.
He enters into this bath and he comes out entirely clean. And I say that we
must have much joy in our souls when we are accounted worthy to come into this
bath. We must celebrate and thank the Lord who allowed this bath on earth, who
allowed this authority of “binding and loosing.” Whatever things your spiritual
father looses, God also looses. Whatever the representative of God forgives,
the Lord also forgives.
And when the man has been judged here below, he is not
judged above in the great and fearsome judgment. It is a great occasion if the
man arrives as far as that. For this reason, all those who have been accounted
worthy of this bath and continuously cleanse every soiling of the soul with
this spiritual bath of the mystery of God, should have very great joy, because
the door of Paradise will always be open. And even if death follows, there is
no anxiety. He is prepared and not disturbed. When the man is prepared, he is
not disturbed at the approach of death. He knows that it is not possible for the
word of God, which gave this authority, to be wrong. We experience it as a
mystery of the Church and we see it in action and in application. When the man
makes sacred confession with ardent desire, with humility, and with awareness,
he feels the happiness within his soul, the lightness and the elation. A vivid
proof that his sins have been forgiven. And when sins are forgiven, then every
anxious and uncertain fear about the next life is removed.
Our thanks to God must be unceasing. Our thanksgiving
must never stop, because we are made worthy every time we want to receive this
cleansing, and every time we feel a sin, immediately turn the mind to God. “I
have sinned Lord, forgive me. ” With this “I have sinned Lord, forgive me, ”
God
answers: My child, you are forgiven; the power of the
law is remitted.
Proceed to the application of the law. And the application is
beneath the petraheli (stole). There, all the sinfulness of man is ended.
Forgiveness is so easy! It is very wrong for man, when this forgiveness is so
easy and so free, because of his egoism not to want to receive it, not to want
to open the doors of paradise and walk eternally in the glory of God!
Many men say: “Man should call upon God because of one
sin? But this thing is wrong. Where is the love of God? Isn’t God a father?”
Yes, he is a father, but when every good moment comes for him to forgive you,
why do you turn your back? Why do you not receive His mercy? Why do you refuse
His embrace and go far away? Why do you accept the embrace of the devil and not
of God? Perhaps your god seeks money or possessions or favors and you don’t
have all these things and for this reason you don’t come to let go of your
debt? No.
God is very rich, as we see also in the parable of the
prodigal son. He wanted to depart far away. He demanded that part of the
possessions which belonged to him. And God gave him what he was owed as
physical gifts. He didn’t deprive him of them. However, he squandered these
gifts, the spiritual possessions, living prodigally. And when he arrived at the
wretched end, he came to his senses, he came to himself. For he was not himself when all the
prodigality reigned. And when he came to
himself he said: How many serve my father and they enjoy the good things of His
possessions, and I His child, par excellence His child, am in such misery that
I graze pigs and am allotted husks! I will return; He is a Father, He will
receive me. I will ask forgiveness and will say to him, do not receive me as
Your child, neither restore me to the first adoption, but I will ask him to
become one of His servants. And this will be a great thing. When he thought
these things, already the Father came out from His house and waited for him
with open arms. He accepted him with all his heart and all his soul. He embraced
him, he kissed him, he wept from joy, because he was dead and he was restored
to life, he was lost and was found. He made him His child again with all of the
wealth. He forgave everything. He cleansed him of every filth. He clothed him in the original garments.
In the end, he gave him everything.
The Heavenly Father also does this when one who is a
sinner returns to Him. He cleanses him, washes him, he gives the original
garments of baptism, he gives him son ship and makes him worthy of His Kingdom.
Everything free. When the prodigal
returned, he didn’t seek an account, neither did he rebuke him nor did he seek
to blame him. He begins where he returned; this was sufficient for the Father.
Only to say “sinner,” to leave his sins with humility, to understand his
mistakes and from then on everything is loosed. But the sinful man doesn’t do
this. He doesn’t return, he isn’t humbled. He holds on to his egoism. The important
thing is to get to the confessional!
It’s just two steps. And from then on everything is finished. Yet the tears of
egoism hold him. And when he comes to the hour of death and the reality of it,
then he will repent and he will be remorseful, but he will be too late. In
this, God respects the one who doesn’t want to humble his spirit a little.
As for Lucifer, this great battalion commander, who
was in the first place of the angelic hosts, what was the cause of the fall?
What was the cause of the collapse, of the transformation from angels to
demons? Pride and egoism. The error came from these two passions. And as with
the angels, so also with our forebears. The fall of our forebears came about
from pride and egoism. Because, before God accomplished the verdict of guilt,
he approached the man Adam and said to him: Adam, why did you do this! Adam
didn’t seek forgiveness, he didn’t say: God forbid, I was wrong. If he had done
this, he wouldn’t have been turned out from Paradise and neither would we have
all this banishment and suffering today. By not saying God forbid all this mob
of evil came about. And thus now man doesn’t say God forbid and remains in his
evil. But just say it, O God stretch out the arms of forgiveness, and He takes
him in.
And again I say that because we have been made worthy
to know as Orthodox Christians this mystery of sacred confes-sion, we should
have very great joy, because even if any time we fall down in some sin, into
something evil, we can run immediately to correct it and to preserve the health
of our souls. And when death comes, we will go to meet the Lord, cleansed,
repentant, as prodigal sons returned, for our Heavenly Father accepts us and
places us in the Paradise of eternal bliss which has no end, which has no
conclusion to that bliss, which cannot be compared to anything earthly.
Even the holy Apostle Paul, who went up to the third
heaven and saw the eternal good things, nevertheless was unable with his
apostolic and graceful tongue to express with human words, the things of Paradise
and the life above! So inexpressible is the happiness of the attainment through
sacred confession.
Therefore with much yearning, with much love, with
much awareness we should run to be cleansed, to be made ready and when death
follows, to depart in peace. Amen.
Orthodox - Heritage, vol 16, issus 01-02
Orthodox - Heritage, vol 16, issus 01-02
You ARE WHAT YOU EAT... By Protopresbyter James Thornton.
My Brothers and Sisters in Christ, soon we Orthodox
Christians begin the Great Fast (Monday, February 19th for the current year,
Ed.). We will enter an extended period of approximately seven weeks of more
intense prayer and fasting until we reach holy Pascha, the Feast of Feasts, the
Feast of Christ’s Resurrection. This is a period of golden opportunity for each
of us wherein we may look deeply within ourselves and determine what, from a
spiritual point of view, is unwholesome or deficient. We may then, during this
time, begin the work of excising from our lives that which is unhealthy and, at
the same time, augmenting that which is truly sound and truly pleasing to God.
I run the risk here of sounding prosaic and
platitudinous when I recall the popular saying, “You are what you eat.” Yet I
shall take the risk: you are indeed what you eat. It is quite obvious that if
we eat luxuriously, if our diet is exclusively confined to the most extravagant
foods, exotically flavored and rich in fats, spices, and sugars, as is typical
of the con-temporary American diet, our individual physiologies will sooner or
later bear the marks of those habits, either in various aspects of outward
appearance or in the functioning of our bodily systems, or in both.
Moreover, our individual characters, personalities,
and temperaments will be marked, and, likewise, and most importantly, our
souls. An obsession with the worldly impresses itself on the whole of our
beings. By way of contrast, more prudent choices in our diets, as prescribed
during the Fast by our wise Mother the Church, will do the opposite, and may
make us physically healthier, and most assuredly will make us spiritually
healthier.
Some religious writers of a modernist or
fundamentalist bent enjoy drawing our attention to the alleged fact that in
early Christianity—primitive Christianity, as it is sometimes called—there were
no Holy Canons regarding fasting, no Great Lent, practically no fasting rules
at all. Holy Canons and fasting periods are seen by these writers as latter-day
and, by implication, needless accretions, even “monkish” accretions in the
estimation of many of them.
St. Paul writes of a difference of opinion between
those who believe that they may eat all things and those who eateth herbs
[i.e., vegetables], as he puts it. (Rom 14:2). We see from this passage that
even at this earliest stage, just a few decades after Christ’s Ascension,
questions about fasting from certain foods were already present and were
already the subject of discussion. So, fasting was not unknown in the Apostolic
Church. In fact, Orthodox historians maintain that the Wednesday and Friday
fasts are of Apostolic origin and it is likely that, while the Lenten fasts
were not codified in their current form until after the Apostolic period, that codification nonetheless reflected an already
established, though not always uniform, tradition.
Consequently, what the modernist and fundamentalist
writers say is true only to the very limited extent that, in St. Paul’s day,
certain details about fasting had not yet appeared and would take time to
unfold. As with medical science or, let us say, the science of physics, the
“science” that is Orthodox theology required time to mature.
The comparison here between the natural sciences and
theology is apt, yet it is imperfect in one respect. In the case of the natural
sciences, new discoveries that radically alter the body of fundamental
knowledge are always possible. The discovery of the connection between bacteria
and disease by nineteenth-century medical science or the displacement of
classical physics by quantum physics in the twentieth century are examples of
this. In the case of Orthodox theology, that cannot happen.
All knowledge needed for salvation has been given us
by Christ; the body of fundamental knowledge remains fixed and changeless. No
radical discoveries about this knowledge are possible. However, a growth in the
understanding of the application of that body of knowledge to our lives is
possible, and that growth, that maturing, has characterized the history of
Orthodoxy.
As the grave risk to life and limb that was associated
with membership in the primitive Church abated in the early fourth century, it
became safe, even fashionable, to belong to the Church. It was then that other
methods for forging the spiritual character became an urgent necessity, and for
this reason fasting took on an increased importance at that time. When one
lives by day and by night under the terror of persecution; when crucifixion,
burning alive, being devoured by wild animals, or being sentenced to a life of
forced labor, are genuine possibilities for the followers of Christ; when one’s
outlook is colored by continuous fear of the knock at the door—in those
circumstances, it may be argued, the most rigorous type of fasting is not as
indispensable as in more tranquil times.
Therefore, those who argue that we ought to return to
the more primitive practice of fasting, in which it was somewhat less comprehensively
regulated, should understand that if membership in Christ’s Church is to
achieve anything positive for us at all, then with this less stringent regimen
in fasting there must also come a desire for trials of the most severe kind elsewhere
in our lives. If membership in Christ’s Church is to make us more like Christ,
either one or the other is indispensable. Considered that way, we can see that
fasting from animal products is not so difficult after all.
Now, let us enter more fully into the message of St.
Paul’s words. In writing of the disputations in the early Roman Church between
those who did not fast so strictly and those
who did, St. Paul offers this admonition: Let not him
that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge
him that eateth: for God hath received him. Who art thou that judgest another
man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. (Rom 14:3-4). What
wonderfully beneficial words these are!
St. Paul is telling us that whatever fasting
discipline others or we follow, the crucial thing is that we address the mat¬ter
of our own relationship with our Master, Jesus Christ, and not judge the
relationship of our neighbor with Him. When we each face the question as to
whether we need to fast more stringently to strengthen our commitment to our
Faith, our answer to that question, and the way our answer manifests itself in
our lives, will ultimately be judged by the Master Whom we serve, when we stand
before His dread judgment seat. So it is also in all the things we choose. It
is not for us to make judgments about our Christian brothers and sisters. For
several reasons we do not judge them:
1. To judge
another is to usurp the place of God; as St. Paul says: Who art thou that
judgest'.
2. To judge
another is to take one’s focus off the place where it should be, and must be,
to save one’s soul, which is on one’s own spiritual imperfections.
3. To judge
another is to incur the danger of an additional sin, misjudging, since we
cannot see into another man’s heart and cannot know all of the circumstances of
his life. St. Dorotheos of Gaza observes that while one can see another man’s
sins, one cannot know about that man’s standing with God, about his secret
prayers of supplication for mercy and forgiveness. You may well know about the
sin, the great Saint writes, but you do not know about the repentance.
(“Discourse and Sayings”)
4. To judge
another brings further dissension and strife into the Church, a place where
peace and love should be the primary attributes.
5. To judge
another is to bring on the temptation of an even worse sin, one of the worst
among sins, which is gossip.
6. Finally,
and most significantly, to judge another is to bring judgment upon ourselves;
Christ Himself warned, judge not, and ye shall not be judged. (Lk 6:37).
We are repeatedly warned as Christians not to judge
other men and women. Does this require that we completely abandon our critical
faculties when it comes to our dealings with other people? If we should know of
a man who is a notorious embezzler, do we do right in judging him unfit to be
the custodian of the public treasury? If we should encounter a man whom we know
to be a psychopathic murderer, do we properly judge it unwise to invite him
over to dinner? The answer to both questions, obviously, is yes.
Let us take some less extreme and more likely
examples. If we learn that a particular friend or companion exerts an un¬
healthy influence on us as Christians, or if we
believe that a friend or companion of our children may lead those children
astray, may we make the appropriate judgment in those cases and terminate such
associations? Again, the answer is yes. Of course we may do that. We would be
held accountable by Christ for not making these kinds of judgments.
What we are forbidden as Christians to do is to judge
another person’s ultimate state before God, or to employ our critical faculties
to enhance, in our own minds, our own rank or station or footing, in what we
fancy are the eyes of God, at the expense of another human being. We are
forbidden, in other words, to regard ourselves as “holy” by comparison with
someone we regard as “sinful.” The Holy Gospel teaches us that
Christ God
judged the outwardly holy men of His country, the Pharisees, very harshly, while
the Good Thief (a most unlikely candidate for salvation, one would think) was
assured everlasting happiness. St. John of the Ladder declares that The
beginning and sum of the passions... is unholy selfesteem. (Step 22).
Let us therefore not fasten our gaze upon the imagined
inadequacies of other men and women during the Great Fast but examine with the
most penetrating contemplation possible our own spiritual failures, that these
may be swiftly amended. For most, if not all of us, that task is sufficient to
fill a lifetime.
Orthodox - Heritage, vol 16, issus 01-02
ON THE HERESY OF CHILIASM THE “THOUSAND YEAR REIGN” By Elder Cleopa of Romania, from “The Truth of Our Faith, ” ch. 16.
ON THE HERESY OF CHILIASM THE “THOUSAND YEAR REIGN”
By Elder Cleopa of Romania, from “The Truth of Our
Faith, ” ch. 16.
Inquirer: There are those who maintain that between
the Second Coming of the Lord and the end of the world Christ will reign upon
the earth, governing, Himself, along with His elect for a thousand years. What
is the truth of the matter, Father?
Elder Cleop a: This idea is an ancient one. In the
first centuries of Christianity, the so-called Chiliasts or Millenialists
endorsed it. Against them rose the entire ancient Church and its most important
representatives.
The divine Fathers of the Church indicated in their
writings that the one thousand year reign referred to in the book of Revelation
signifies an infinite number of years, i.e., a kingdom that shall have no end.
This we know well since from Holy Scripture it is clear that the Kingdom of
Christ is not of this world. (Jn 18:36). In Holy Scripture it is clearly
indicated that the Kingdom of Heaven is also the Kingdom of God or Kingdom of
Christ, in so much as both Saint John the Forerunner and Christ Himself called
it so. This Kingdom of Christ will be spiritual and will reign over the
internal world of man, while externally being revealed in the righteousness,
peace and joy of the Holy Spirit. (Rom 14:17). Christ Himself established this
kingdom and explained in His parables how it will appear, whom it will include
and what power it will possess. His reign will not endure for a thousand years,
but eternally. (Lk 1:33). Its inhabitants will include all faithful Christians
from all the peoples of the world. (Pss 116:1-2), it will reign over all
creation, all people, nations, and languages, and it will be a kingdom of
righteousness. (Dan 7:13-14). It will be a kingdom made up of souls (Mt.
28:18)—souls that have already entered and lived within it in this present
life.
This kingdom of Christ, derived not from this world,
constitutes the Church, or the Body, of Christ, of which the head is Christ
Himself {Eph 1:22). The adoption and entrance into this kingdom takes place
only through the laver of regeneration (Tit 3:5) or birth from above (Jn 3:3).
No one can enter into this reign of God except through baptism (Rom 6:3), which
is to say by being born again from above or being born of water and the Spirit,
according to the word of the Saviour: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a
man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God
(Jn 3:5). This heavenly birth by the power of the All-holy Spirit is a true
resurrection from the dead (Col. 2:12-13), and hence the reason why Baptism is
so often referred to as resurrection (Rom 6:3-5). Thus, also, it is that the
Orthodox Christian baptism is a renaissance of life and a resurrection from the
dead. When the Apostle Paul writes awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the
dead, and Christ shall give thee light, (Eph. 5:14) he has in mind precisely
this internal regeneration and resurrection through Christian Baptism, for no
one can enter the Kingdom of Christ unless he has first been brought out from
among the dead by Christian Baptism.
Holy Scripture speaks to us about the thousand-year
reign in prophetic and symbolic terms, corresponding to that which we spoke of
above. Here is what Saint John the Evangelist says in his Revelation: And I saw
an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a
great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent,
which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him
into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he
should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be
fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season. And I saw thrones,
and they sat upon them, and judgement was given unto them: and I saw the souls
of them that were beheadedfor the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and
which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his
mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with
Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the
thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy
is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath
no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with
him a thousand years.
And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be
loosed out of his prison, and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in
the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to
battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the
breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the
beloved city: andfire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. And
the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone,
where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night
forever and ever. And I saw a great white throne, ana him that sat on it, from
whose face the earth and the heaver, fled away; and there was found no place
for them. And I sau the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books
wen opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the
dead were judged out of those things which w-rewritten in the books, according
to their works. And the sea g.;: -: up the dead which were in it; and death and
hell deliverer^ the dead which were in them: and they were judged ever, ma n
according to their works. And death and hell were cast into vre lake of fire. This is the second death. (Rev.
20:1-14).
From this passage, we can ascertain the following:
[1] The
thousand-year reign of Christ is a period in which Christ has bound the power
of the Devil over men. (w. 1-2)
[2] At the
end of this period, the Devil will again be lord over men and oppress them, but
only for a season, (v. 3)
[3] The
members of this kingdom will be those alone who do not submit to the beast and
accept his engraved seal, and who have a part in the first resurrection, (w.
4-5)
[4] Those
who were not worthy of this resurrection will be raised at the end of the thousand
years, that is at the second resurrection, as this resurrection, relative to
the first, is the second, (v. 5)
[5] Death
will have no power over the sharers in the thou-sand-year reign, (v. 6)
[6] At the
end of these thousand years and after a grue- somely violent persecution
against the saints, the devil and his followers will be cast into the lake of
fire—the second death, (w. 4-15)
From this it should be abundantly clear that the
thousand- year kingdom is nothing else but the Kingdom of God or Kingdom of
Heaven, and this is clear seeing that:
[1] In the
period of this reign, the Devil was bound and loosed, receiving power over men.
Christ entered into His dominion and bound the Devil, that is, by the
redemption of humanity by His Blood He bound and restrained his power over
mankind.
[2] The
entrance into this kingdom presupposes the first resurrection, that is, none
other than holy baptism itself, often, in fact, called by the name of
resurrection, or being born again from above or simply regeneration. This resurrection
through baptism is the first, in comparison to the second, the general one, of
the body, which is also called the last resurrection, as when Martha spoke to
Christ concerning her brother: I know that he shall rise again at the
resurrection on the Last Day. (Jn 11:24).
[3] At the
end of this kingdom or reign, the Devil will again be let loose to deceive the
people and with power and mania to assault and oppress holy Christians in the
person of the antichrist, the beast or false prophet. (Rev 13:1-11).
[4] The
duration of this period will be brief and yet it will constitute one of the
signs signaling the immediacy of the Second Coming of Christ. (Mt 24:22; Rev
13:5, 20:3).
Therefore, it should be clearly known that the first
resurrection is the baptismal resurrection and the second resurrection is that
which we await on the last day, the last resurrection. Furthermore, it should
also be clear that the first death is the tatural one or the separation of the
soul from the body, while he second death is the eternal torment (of hell) (Mt
18:8), so ailed due to its opposition to the blessed life of eternity. (Jn:24ft
It should also be clear that this second death has no ower over those made
worthy of the first resurrection. Like- use, from this it follows that the
first death, from which not ren the saints are delivered, is the natural or
bodily death.
In Holy Scripture someone’s sinful condition is also
compared to a kind of death. It is with this meaning that the Saviour says to
one of His disciples who had asked leave to first go and bury his father,
Follow me, and let the dead bury their dead. (Mt 8:22). Likewise does He speak
with this in mind when saying, He that believeth in Me, though he were dead,
yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.
(Jn 11:25). The Apostle also had this meaning in mind when he wrote, reckon ye
also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus
Christ our Lord (Rom 6:11, 8:10). Moreover, with this meaning as well is it
written to the angel of the Church in Sardis: I know thy works, and that thou
hast a name that thou livest, but thou art dead. (Rev. 3:1).
Although the duration of the reign of Christ is
designated on the whole as a thousand years, we should understand this to
signify an era immeasurable and undesignated. Therefore, its length is nothing
else except the period between the first and second comings of the Lord, or
more precisely, the period of the consolidation of the Kingdom of God until His
Second Coming. This is the explanation of the Kingdom of God and its duration
upon this earth.
Inquirer: Father, recently I had a very disturbing
conversation with some people concerning this question and came away with the
opinion that the thousand-year reign could only be understood in earthly terms.
This might be the case seeing that it will be inaugurated at the Second Coming;
it will be preceded by the resurrection of the righteous who in turn will reign
with Christ for a thousand years; and after which will occur the resurrection
of sinners, the judgement and the end of the world.
This interpretation seems to me to proceed from the
twentieth chapter of Revelation that you read earlier. It can be deduced from
that chapter that there will be final resurrections: the first resurrection of
the righteous at the beginning of the thousand years and the second
resurrection of the sinful at the end of world, (w. 4-5)
During the period of a thousand years the active power
of the Devil will be restricted up until just before the end when, after a
brief but horrible flurry of aggression, he will be thrown into Hades together
with all of his servants (w. 7-14). Afterward, they will be resurrected, judged
and condemned to eternal punishment (w. 12-15). After the first period, we will
pass through to the end of the world (v. n). This is, for example, what the Apostle
Paul says when writing to the Christians of Thessalonica: For if we believe
that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God
bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which
are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which
are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with
the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ
shall rise first (Thess 4:14-16). Consequently, at His Second Coming Christ
will raise those who have died faithful to Him, i.e. those that, as the Apostle
says, shall rise first, hence the first resurrection.
The resurrection of the
dead, or the second resurrection, will follow later—He does not tell us exactly
when—but according to Revelation, it will be after a thousand years. Listen to
what Saint Paul says about this: But every man in his own order: Christ the
firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. (Cor 15:23). In
other words, the Just join the choir of the Righteous at the beginning of the
thousand-year reign and the sinful an assembly of their own at the end of the
thousand-year period. Is this not the truth of matter, Father?
Elder Cleopa: As I explained to you earlier, the True
Church of Christ understands the millennium of Holy Scripture mystically and
symbolically to mean an indeterminate number of years. Do you think that
Scripture only in this passage speaks in a mystical and veiled manner, or could
it be that many hard to comprehend subjects are approached in this way? Are
there not, in fact, many mystical, symbolic and allegorical expressions or
events that cannot be explained literally but carry exalted and spiritual meanings
often completely different from that readily apparent? How can we explain the
book of Revelation literally, when it is bound with seven seals? (Rev. 5:1)
What is the red horse that is like unto fire} (Rev 6:4). In addition, what of
the seven angels who were given seven plagues? (Rev. 15:1-7) How should we
understand them?
There are those who speak of two resurrections at the
end of the world, and thus, according to them, somehow a third coming of the
Lord must take place. However, such a thing is surely not true. It was shown
above that, the first resurrection is realized through Christian baptism and
the second is the last or general resurrection (of the body). Saint John the
Evangelist renders precisely the words of the Saviour concerning the two
resurrections: Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and
believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into
condemnation; but is passedfrom death unto life. Verily, verily, I say unto
you,
The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the
Son of God: and they that hear shall live. (Jn. 5:24-25). As this passage
concerns, the resurrection of those who will hear the voice of the Son of God,
i.e. that resurrection which now is, this cannot be interpreted as referring to
the last resurrection, but only to the present resurrection of those who are
raised from the death of sin to the life of Christ, to the new life of
Christian faith entered, as the Apostle and Evangelist himself relates
elsewhere, through Christian baptism. (Jn 5:24-25).
This is the first
resurrection referred to in the book of Revelation.
Further, on the Saviour speaks about another kind of
resurrection, a resurrection that even now is and yet will, however, happen at
the end of the world, which is not of the soul but of the body, and
specifically of the dead in the graves. Marvel
not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all
that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that
have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil,
unto the resurrection of damnation. (Jn 5:28-29). In other words, marvel not at
the power of Christ to raise spiritually (i.e. in the first resurrection), for
indeed He will raise all the dead from the graves as well. This passage
excludes outright the possibility of their being a period of a thousand years
between the resurrection of the righteous and the resurrection of the sinful,
for it shows clearly that the last or general resurrection is one and only and
will happen to all. This is the second resurrection. As for the first, we saw
that it is that resurrection which now is, the present resurrection, and not
the general or last.
Thus, through an analysis and comparison of the
passages of Holy Scripture, we see how their meaning is clarified and
elucidated, and how the possibility of an interpolation of a one thousand-year
period between the two resurrections is ruled out. According to the teaching of
the true Church of Christ, the one thousand-year period should be understood as
extending between the first resurrection, which happens in Christian baptism,
and the second or last resurrection.
This is, in fact, what we find in Saint Paul’s first
letter to the Thessalonians (Thess 4:14-16), where he speaks only of one
resurrection and not a second or last resurrection. It is true that here Saint
Paul is referring to the resurrection of the Just who have fallen asleep in the
Lord and not to the resurrection of sinners. However, this is not because they
will be raised later, after a thousand years, but simply because the Apostle
Paul and his listeners are only concerned about the fate of those asleep in
Christ. The fact that he makes no reference to sinners does not mean that they
will be raised a thousand years later. The Apostle is not in the least
concerned here with other questions, for his aim in this epistle is to comfort
his readers (v. 18), that they be not sorrowful, anxious or in ignorance,
concerning the fate of those reposed in Christ.
In his first epistle to the Corinthians (15:23), Saint
Paul speaks of there being orders.
The Chiliasts wrongly interpret this passage
as referring only to two orders, namely of the Just and of the sinful, whose
resurrections will be separated by a period of one thousand years. In truth, Saint
Paul is speaking here of many orders, analogous to the degree of holiness or
sinfulness {for one differeth from another in glory—see w. 39-41) with which
they will be revealed.
Holy Scripture is explicit and categorical in many
places concerning the Second Coming of Christ, namely, that it will be one
single date for all, righteous and sinners alike, without there being a period
of one thousand years between the resurrection and judgement of some and that
of others. The Saviour said: For the hour is coming, in which all that are in
the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done
good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the
resurrection of damnation. (Jn 5:28-29). Hence, there will be one voice alone
announcing the resurrection of all. In another place the Lord also says: When
the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then
shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all
nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth
his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the
goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come,
ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the
foundation of the world... Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand,
Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire ... (Mt 25:31-46).
Here the Saviour speaks with precision and clarity
concerning His Second Coming and future judgement. In this most glorious
parable He communicates the following certainty: there will be one harvest for
the wheat and the tares alike (Mt 13:30, 42-43), the Bridegroom will come for
all the virgins at one and the same time (Mt 25:1-13), and in the same hour
will a reckoning be sought for the work done by the servants entrusted with the
talents. (Mt 25:14-30). Therefore, one is the last advent of Christ, one the
resurrection and appearance of all before the King and Judge, and one the
judgement of mankind. Inquirer; I read in a “brochure” that the date of the
beginning of the millennium can be determined, and that it will not be
identical with the date of the Second Coming, and that it represents the end of
the era of idol-worship. Does this have any validity?
Elder Cleopa: First, know with absolute assurance
that there does not exist any such millennium with the meaning conveyed in that
“brochure.” If the date of the Second Coming of Christ cannot be determined, as
neither the angels nor even the Son of Man, as man, have been informed of it
(Mt 24:36-44), then surely neither can the date of the beginning of the
millennium be determined.
We know that in that which pertains to salvation, the
history of the world can only be divided into two periods: that of the Old
Testament and that of the New Testament. Another age will begin with the Second
Coming of our Lord, but this will be the last and everlasting age. In the
history of the world, there existed other lesser episodes, which subdivided the
two great periods without thereby constituting two or three more periods. Ages
or epochs that we have with this meaning include that of the patriarchs, the
apostles, the persecutions and so on.
Concerning the passages of the Old Testament, these
cannot be understood as if they were magical, but are either factual or
symbolic like the book from which they are derived. How can someone know that
the six days of creation were, in actuality, some seven thousand years and that
they each represent a great duration of time for humanity or even one thousand
years?
Nowhere does it say in Holy Scripture that one day is
equal to one thousand years, but only that before the creation of the visible
world time did not exist. Time, for God, is neither fixed nor appointed, but,
rather, one day before God is considered as a thousand years and a thousand
years as one day or as a night watch (2Pet 3:8). It does not follow from this
that any figures presented within Holy Scripture represent a certain number of
days, which we then reckon as years.
Inquirer: With respect to that which is said in the
Symbol of our Faith [The Nicene - Constantinople Creed, 325 and 381 A.D.] In
addition, His kingdom shall have no end, the Chiliasts say that the Lord will
come before the Future Judgement to rule with them a thousand years, and that
afterward he will raise the sinners to be judged. Isn’t it true that the Lord
will rule endlessly after the final judgement?
Elder Cleopa: The True Church tells us that the
kingdom of the Lord will have no end. The Reign of Jesus Christ, as man, and
His Glory will never come to an end, but will endure eternally. For, on the one
hand, Jesus is not only human, from whom God could someday take His glory,
while on the other hand as the Son of God He will never deny His human nature.
His being a Man, so filled with divine glory, will never come to an end.
The holy Archangel Gabriel announced the everlasting
Reign of Jesus Christ in advance. It is true, as Saint Paul says, that Christ
will be subjected in everything to the Father and afterward that He will
subject everything to Himself. Yet, this means the submission of the entire
world before the Father and the cessation of His redemptive activity (Cor.
15:25-28), as it is His own work, which He assumed at His incarnation.
So, let the Chiliasts know that they cannot make human
calculations and determinations for mysteries that are unknown to the angels,
and even, in His humanity, to the Son of God Himself.
Elder
Cleopa (+1998)
Orthodox - Heritage, vol 16, issus 01-02
Πόσο μεγάλη δόξα εν ούρανοίς αξιώθηκε ό άγιος Συμεών ό Θεοδόχος, ό όποιος κράτησε στα χέρια του το Σωτήρα του κόσμου! Τούτο φαίνεται ολοκάθαρα από το ακόλουθο περιστατικό από τον βίο του αγίου Πέτρου του Αθωνίτου (12 Ιουνίου).
Πόσο
μεγάλη δόξα εν ούρανοίς αξιώθηκε ό άγιος Συμεών ό Θεοδόχος, ό όποιος κράτησε στα χέρια
του το Σωτήρα του κόσμου!
Τούτο
φαίνεται ολοκάθαρα από το ακόλουθο περιστατικό από τον βίο του αγίου Πέτρου του
Αθωνίτου (12 Ιουνίου).
Ό Πέτρος ήταν στρατηγός και κατά τη διάρκεια
μιας μάχης συνελήφθη, αλυσοδέθηκε και φυλακίστηκε στην πόλη Σαμάρα, στις όχθες του
ποταμού Ευφράτη. Για μεγάλο χρονικό διάστημα έλιωνε στη φυλακή και στο τέλος
άρχισε να ικετεύει με δάκρυα τον άγιο Νικόλαο, να πρεσβεύει στον Θεό ώστε να απελευθερωθεί
από τη, φυλακή• μάλιστα υποσχέθηκε ν’ αφιερωθεί ολοκληρωτικά στον Θεό. Πράγματι
ό άγιος Νικόλαος φανερώθηκε στον Πέτρο σε όνειρο και του είπε πώς, μολονότι
προσευχήθηκε γι’ αυτόν, ό Θεός ανέβαλε να επιτρέψει την απελευθέρωση, διότι
αύτός (ό Πέτρος) είχε ξαναδώσει στο παρελθόν παρόμοια υπόσχεση αφιέρωσης και
δεν την είχε τηρήσει.
Επιπλέον ό άγιος Νικόλαος τον συμβούλευε να
προσευχηθεί στον άγιο Συμεών τον Θεοδόχο, ό όποιος «έχει μεγάλη παρρησία
ενώπιον του Θεού και ίσταται κοντά στον θρόνο του Θεού μαζί με την Παναγία και
τον άγιο Ιωάννη τον Πρόδρομο». Ό Πέτρος έλαβε ύπ' όψιν του την παραίνεση του
άγιου Νικολάου και προσευχήθηκε θερμά.
Παρουσιάστηκε τότε πάλι ό άγιος μάζι με
τον άγιο Συμεών όχι πια σε όνειρο, άλλα στην πραγματικότητα.
Ό
Πέτρος είδε το Συμεών μέσα σε δόξα και φως που έλαμπε από το πρόσωπό του, ενδεδυμένο
τα άμφια των ιερέων της Παλαιάς Διαθήκης, με χρυσή αρχιερατική ράβδο ανά χείρας.
Ό άγιος Συμεών είπε στον Πέτρο: «Θέλεις να εκπληρώσεις την υπόσχεσή σου και να
γίνεις μοναχός;».
Εκείνος απάντησε: «Ναί, δέσποτα, με τη βοήθεια
του Θεού». Τότε ό Συμεών άγγιξε τις αλυσίδες του Πέτρου με τη ράβδο του και οι αλυσίδες
έλιωσαν σαν κερί. Ύστερα, ανοίγοντας τις θύρες της φυλακής, ό άγιος Συμεών τον
οδήγησε έξω από αυτήν.
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
Διά πρεσβειών, Κύριε, τού Αγαπητού Σου πρεσβύτου, άγιου Συμεών, τού θαυμαστού Θεοδόχου. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΒΕΛΙΜΙΟΒΙΤΣ.
Παντοδύναμε Κύριε, ελέησον και σώσον - μη
σβήσεις με τον θάνατο αυτή τη μικρή φλόγα!
Το
παιδί αυτό είναι σαν τη φλογίτσα ενός κεριού, και οι άνεμοι τού κόσμου είναι
φοβεροί, ενάντιοι ακόμη και για τ' άστρα.
Μια αδύναμη
φωτιά κάτω από τις στάχτες σβήνει, όπως και μια ανθρώπινη ψυχή μπορεί κάτω άπ’
το χέρι Σου να σβήσει.
Όταν
το νερό ανεβαίνει και φθάνει μέχρι τον λαιμό, και ή φλόγα τρεμοσβήνει και ή
φωτιά νοτίζετε, ώ Κύριε, σώσε, ελέησε και παρηγόρησή μας!
Έτσι προσευχόταν σε
Σένα ό προφήτης Δαβίδ.
Μολονότι
ήταν λύχνος παμφαέστατος, όμως στις παρυφές του ουρανού ήταν ένα αδύναμο παιδί,
και από πονηρές επιθυμίες βασανιζόταν στον πόνο και από πονηρούς λογισμούς το
κεφάλι του πονούσε- κάθε άνεμος κακίας τον έκανε και πιο αδύναμο.
Θά
είχε σβηστεί γρήγορα από τούς σφοδρούς ανέμους αν δεν τον είχες σώσει Εσύ,
Βοήθεια Τάχιστη, ώ Κύριε, ελέησε και σώσε μας, έστω και τώρα, την ύστατη ώρα, και μη
σβήνεις με το θάνατο αυτή τη μικρή φλόγα!
Διά πρεσβειών, Κύριε, τού Αγαπητού
Σου πρεσβύτου, άγιου Συμεών, τού θαυμαστού Θεοδόχου.
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
ΑΓΙΟΣ ΣΥΜΕΩΝ Ο ΘΕΟΔΟΧΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΒΕΛΙΜΙΟΒΙΤΣ.
ΑΓΙΟΣ ΣΥΜΕΩΝ Ο ΘΕΟΔΟΧΟΣ.
Ό πρεσβύτης Συμεών έπελέγη επί
βασιλείας του Αιγυπτίου αυτοκράτορα Πτολεμαίου Φιλαδέλφου ως ένας από τους
περίφημους Εβδομήκοντα σοφούς, στους οποίους ανατέθηκε το μείζον έργο τις
μεταφράσεως της Βίβλου από τα Εβραϊκά στα Ελληνικά. Ό Συμεών επιτελούσε ευσυνείδητα
την αποστολή του αύτή, άλλα κατά τη διαδικασία της μεταφράσεως τού Βιβλίου του
Προφήτη Ησαΐα, έφθασε στο επίμαχο εδάφιο της προφητείας: Ιδού ή παρθένος εν
γαστρι έξει και τέξεται υιόν, και καλέσεις το όνομα αυτού Εμμανουήλ (Ήσ. 7:14).
Αυτό του προκάλεσε σύγχυση και, στην αμηχανία του, πήρε ένα μαχαιρίδιο γιά να αφαιρέσει
τη λέξη «παρθένος» και να την αντικαταστήσει με την ελληνική λέξη «νεάνις».
Αμέσως όμως άγγελος του Θεού παρουσιάστηκε και εμπόδισε τον Συμεών από το
εγχείρημα αυτό, εξηγώντας του ότι ή προφητεία
ήταν αληθής και ορθά γραμμένη. Ό αγγελιαφόρος του Θεού είπε ακόμη ότι ό ίδιος ό
Συμεών θά βεβαίωνε του λόγου το αληθές, διότι, σύμφωνα με το θέλημα του Θεού,
δεν επρόκειτο να πεθάνει προτού να δει τον Μεσαία, τον εκ της Παρθένου γεννηθέντα.
Ό δίκαιος Συμεών αγαλλίασε στο άκουσμα μιας τέτοιας φωνής εξ ουρανού, άφησε
αμετάβλητη τη διατύπωση της προφητείας και δόξασε τον Θεό πού τον αξίωσε να ζήσει
και να δει τον Έπηγγελμένο. Όταν το παιδίον Ιησούς παρουσιάστηκε στο Ναό της
Ιερουσαλήμ από την Παρθένο Μαρία, το Πνεύμα του Θεού το αποκάλυψε στο Συμεών, ό
όποιος ήταν πρεσβύτης υπέργηρος και «λευκός ως κύκνος». Ό Συμεών εισήρθε
δρομαίος στον Ναό και εκεί αναγνώρισε τόσο την Παρθένο, όσο και το Παιδίον, από
το φως πού σαν φωτοστέφανο περιέλαμπε τα κεφάλια τους. Ό ευτυχής Συμεών βάσταξε
τον Χριστό στα χέρια του και προσευχήθηκε στο Θεό να τον πάρει απ’ αύτήν τη ζωή:
Νϋν απολύεις τον δούλο σου Δέσποτα, κατά το ρήμα σου εν ειρήνη ότι ειδον οι
οφθαλμοί μου το σωτήριόν σου (Λουκ. 2:29). Παρίστατο επίσης ή προφήτις Άννα,
θυγατέρα του Σαμουήλ και αύτή αναγνώρισε τον Μεσσία και Τον κήρυξε στον λαό. Ή
άγια Άννα ήταν τότε 84 ετών. Ό άγιος Συμεών ύστερα από λίγο πέθανε. Ό δίκαιος
πρεσβύτης θεωρείται προστάτης των μικρών
παιδιών.
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ. Ο ΠΡΟΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ. ΑΓΙΟΥ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΥ ΑΧΡΙΔΟΣ.ΜΗΝΑΣ ΦΕΒΡΟΥΑΡΙΟΣ.
ΕΚΔΟΣΕΙΣ ΑΘΩΣ.
Οι πολυχρονισμοί των αρχιερέων, "εις πολλά έτη", έχουν μια στενή σχέση με τους πολυχρονισμούς των αυτοκρατόρων στο Βυζάντιο. Πολυχρονισμοί λέγονταν στα Ανάκτορα ή στον Ιππόδρομο όπου τελοσπάντων λάμβανε χώρα επίσημη παράσταση του αυτοκράτορα. Ο πολυχρονισμοί ωστόσο δεν ήταν ανατολική εφεύρεση: ανάγονται στην εποχή της αυτοκρατορικής Ρώμης -πριν δηλαδή ο Χριστιανισμός αναγνωριστεί ως θρησκεία της Αυτοκρατορίας. Στη πορεία του χρόνου και με την άλωση της Πόλης, οι πολυχρονισμοί αποδόθηκαν στον Πατριάρχη του Γένους, αφού αυτοκράτορας έπαψε να υπάρχει. Σιγά σιγά, ο πολυχρονισμός άρχισε να ψάλλεται στον κάθε αρχιερέα κι απ' τον κάθε αρχιερέα στον κάθε λειτουργό πρεσβύτερο. Βέβαια, αντίστοιχους πολυχρονισμούς επιζήτησαν και οι Φράγκοι στη Δυτική τους Αυτοκρατορία. Προτάσσεται λοιπόν ο ύμνος "ο Χριστός Νικά, ο Χριστός Βασιλεύει, ο Χριστός Θριαμβεύει" (Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus Imperat) με μιαν επιθυμία ταύτισης της Βασιλείας του Χριστού μ' εκείνη των Φράγκων Αυτοκρατόρων (κάτι βέβαια που γίνεται στην Αναστολή εξίσου). Έπειτα, ακολουθούν ικεσίες στη Θεοτόκο, στους Αγίους Αποστόλους και Αγίους Προστάτες της Δύσης σ' έναν διάλογο που μεγαλύνει το πρόσωπο του δυτικού αυτοκράτορα. Στις μέρες μας, με τη διάλυση των αυτοκρατοριών και τη δημιουργία των εθνικών κρατών, το μεγαλυνάριο του αυτοκράτορα επιβιώνει. Ωστόσο, όπως και στην Ανατολή, πλέον μεγαλύνεται μόνο ο Επίσκοπος της Ρώμης αφού αυτοκράτορες εν γένει δεν υπάρχουν πια.
Εγγραφή σε:
Αναρτήσεις (Atom)







